Difference between revisions of "2003-05 Should the DMCA Prevail: Analysis of the Constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (DMCA page uses acronym, not full name)
(converted to new format)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[category:data.links]]</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|2003-05}}
+
<hide>
{{data.pair|Topics|\DMCA\University of Arizona\US Constitution}}
+
<let name=data index=Date>2003-05</let>
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://serg.us/paper/dmca_thesis.htm}}
+
<let name=data index=Author>Sergey G. Zaytsev</let>
{{data.pair|Title|Should the DMCA Prevail: Analysis of the Constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act}}
+
<let name=data index=Topics>\DMCA\University of Arizona\US Constitution</let>
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;The 21st century has arrived and the way people deal with information has changed dramatically. Digital ways of creating, storing, and transferring information are now more readily available. Information in a digital form brings a lot of advantages to the consumer. Music Compact Disks (CDs) practically forced out analog vinyl disks and magnetic audiotapes, Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs) are pushing out videotapes, and more and more books are available in digital form. It is reasonable to assume that some analog types of documents ([[copyright]]ed works) are living their last years and ready to become obsolete. .. Probably the majority of the documents in the future will exist in a digital form. To deal with the new reality of an emerging future the [[Digital Millennium Copyright Act]] (DMCA) was enacted in 1998. This paper tries to address the issue of whether the DMCA will withstand the critique toward it from the technology-oriented community, some legal counselors, as well as the general public in the light of [[US Constitution|constitution]]al scrutiny.&rdquo;}}<noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=URL>http://serg.us/paper/dmca_thesis.htm</let>
{{data.link.footer}}
+
<let name=data index=Title>Should the DMCA Prevail: Analysis of the Constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act</let>
</noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=TextShort>&ldquo;This paper tries to address the issue of whether the [[DMCA]] will withstand the critique toward it from the technology-oriented community, some legal counselors, as well as the general public in the light of [[US Constitution|constitution]]al scrutiny.&rdquo;</let>
 +
<let name=data index=Text>
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<p>The 21st century has arrived and the way people deal with information has changed dramatically. Digital ways of creating, storing, and transferring information are now more readily available. Information in a digital form brings a lot of advantages to the consumer. Music Compact Disks (CDs) practically forced out analog vinyl disks and magnetic audiotapes, Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs) are pushing out videotapes, and more and more books are available in digital form. It is reasonable to assume that some analog types of documents ([[copyright]]ed works) are living their last years and ready to become obsolete.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Probably the majority of the documents in the future will exist in a digital form. To deal with the new reality of an emerging future the [[Digital Millennium Copyright Act]] (DMCA) was enacted in 1998. This paper tries to address the issue of whether the DMCA will withstand the critique toward it from the technology-oriented community, some legal counselors, as well as the general public in the light of [[US Constitution|constitution]]al scrutiny.</p>
 +
</blockquote></let>
 +
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>

Revision as of 19:58, 29 June 2009