2005-08-11 Not another one

From Issuepedia
Revision as of 11:40, 20 May 2008 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{#vardefine:Date|2005-08-11}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Date}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|2005-08-11}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|[[{{#var:Date}}]]}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\James Taranto\Eugene Volokh\opposition is treason}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\James Taranto\Eugene Volokh\opposition is treason}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/11/not-another-one/}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/11/not-another-one/}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CNot another one}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|Not another one}}{{#vardefine:Text|“Cheers to Eugene Volokh for opening commments on this post. If it weren’t for that decision, I might have simply been appalled by Professor Volokh’s willingness to pass on a vicious smear of war opponents. I would likely have missed how poorly sourced the insinuations about the marital faithfulness of a dead man were.” ... “Of course, James Taranto carelessly uses this sort of language all the time, and readers know damn well who he’s talking about. It’s not referring to a handful of psychopaths and extremists who hardly need refuting. It’s aimed at opponents of the war in Iraq, who aren’t anti-war, just on the other side. In the past few years, we’ve seen a constant, sickening effort on the part of supporters of the war in Iraq to conflate opposition the war with support for terrorists.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“Cheers to Eugene Volokh for opening commments on this post. If it weren’t for that decision, I might have simply been appalled by Professor Volokh’s willingness to pass on a vicious smear of war opponents. I would likely have missed how poorly sourced the insinuations about the marital faithfulness of a dead man were.” ... “Of course, James Taranto carelessly uses this sort of language all the time, and readers know damn well who he’s talking about. It’s not referring to a handful of psychopaths and extremists who hardly need refuting. It’s aimed at opponents of the war in Iraq, who aren’t anti-war, just on the other side. In the past few years, we’ve seen a constant, sickening effort on the part of supporters of the war in Iraq to conflate opposition the war with support for terrorists.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}

  • Topic pages:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}
  • Topic categories:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}