Difference between revisions of "2006-07-11 Officers arrest men for videotaping them"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - "}}<noinclude> {{data.link.footer}} </noinclude>" to "</let> </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> category:batch edit/v1 to v2") |
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair\|(.*)\|(.*)}}" to "<let name=data index=$1>$2</let>") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
<let name=data index=Date>2006-07-11}} | <let name=data index=Date>2006-07-11}} | ||
− | + | <let name=data index=Topics>\transparency\citizen empowerment\Albuquerque, NM\citizen disempowerment\Instapundit</let> | |
<let name=data index=URL>http://www.ljfind.com/post/54890880/}} | <let name=data index=URL>http://www.ljfind.com/post/54890880/}} | ||
− | + | <let name=data index=Title>Officers arrest men for videotaping them</let> | |
{{data.pair|Text|“Undercover officers with the New Mexico Department of Public Safety that were out Saturday night trying to bust drunks leaving bars arrested three men for videotaping them.” At least [http://instapundit.com/archives/031376.php one] conservative blogger states, in commenting on this, that it should always be legal to video the police.</let> | {{data.pair|Text|“Undercover officers with the New Mexico Department of Public Safety that were out Saturday night trying to bust drunks leaving bars arrested three men for videotaping them.” At least [http://instapundit.com/archives/031376.php one] conservative blogger states, in commenting on this, that it should always be legal to video the police.</let> | ||
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | ||
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] | [[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] |