Difference between revisions of "2006-07-11 Officers arrest men for videotaping them"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair|Text|" to "<let name=data index=Text>") |
m (Text replace - "<let name=data index=(.+)>(.+)}}" to "<let name=data index=$1>$2</let>") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
− | <let name=data index=Date>2006-07-11 | + | <let name=data index=Date>2006-07-11</let> |
<let name=data index=Topics>\transparency\citizen empowerment\Albuquerque, NM\citizen disempowerment\Instapundit</let> | <let name=data index=Topics>\transparency\citizen empowerment\Albuquerque, NM\citizen disempowerment\Instapundit</let> | ||
− | <let name=data index=URL>http://www.ljfind.com/post/54890880/ | + | <let name=data index=URL>http://www.ljfind.com/post/54890880/</let> |
<let name=data index=Title>Officers arrest men for videotaping them</let> | <let name=data index=Title>Officers arrest men for videotaping them</let> | ||
<let name=data index=Text>“Undercover officers with the New Mexico Department of Public Safety that were out Saturday night trying to bust drunks leaving bars arrested three men for videotaping them.” At least [http://instapundit.com/archives/031376.php one] conservative blogger states, in commenting on this, that it should always be legal to video the police.</let> | <let name=data index=Text>“Undercover officers with the New Mexico Department of Public Safety that were out Saturday night trying to bust drunks leaving bars arrested three men for videotaping them.” At least [http://instapundit.com/archives/031376.php one] conservative blogger states, in commenting on this, that it should always be legal to video the police.</let> | ||
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | ||
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] | [[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] |