Difference between revisions of "2006-08-29 Michael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://www.issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms)
 
m (Text replace - "<noinclude>category:data.links</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|" to "<hide> <let name=data index=Date>")
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[category:data.links]]</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|2006-08-29}}
+
<hide>
 +
<let name=data index=Date>2006-08-29}}
 
{{data.pair|Topics|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}}
 
{{data.pair|Topics|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}}
 
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/08/michael_gerson_and_the_new_rep.php}}
 
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/08/michael_gerson_and_the_new_rep.php}}

Revision as of 18:01, 4 April 2011

<hide> <let name=data index=Date>2006-08-29}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/08/michael_gerson_and_the_new_rep.php}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/08/michael_gerson_and_the_new_rep.php}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CMichael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research }}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|Michael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research }}{{#vardefine:Text|“Seen as a smart political compromise... by who? Everyone I know saw it as a sham, a transparent attempt to put in place an effective ban on the research while keeping a few excuses handy to block criticism. The rest of the paragraph is built entirely on a false assumption, that what Bush was doing was defending "human life" (it's a tiny collection of cells, the humanity of which wasn't even accepted by religious tradition) and phrasing blastulae as "lives of the weak" is putting a ridiculous spin on it.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“Seen as a smart political compromise... by who? Everyone I know saw it as a sham, a transparent attempt to put in place an effective ban on the research while keeping a few excuses handy to block criticism. The rest of the paragraph is built entirely on a false assumption, that what Bush was doing was defending "human life" (it's a tiny collection of cells, the humanity of which wasn't even accepted by religious tradition) and phrasing blastulae as "lives of the weak" is putting a ridiculous spin on it.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}

  • Topic pages:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}
  • Topic categories:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}