Difference between revisions of "2007-05-23 Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment"
m (Text replace - "<noinclude>category:data.links</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|" to "<hide> <let name=data index=Date>") |
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair|URL|2=" to "<let name=data index=URL>") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<let name=data index=Date>2007-05-23}} | <let name=data index=Date>2007-05-23}} | ||
{{data.pair|Topics|\Age of Enlightenment\active atheism\religion control\PZ Myers/posts}} | {{data.pair|Topics|\Age of Enlightenment\active atheism\religion control\PZ Myers/posts}} | ||
| − | + | <let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/donothing_atheists_and_reignit.php}} | |
{{data.pair|Title|Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment}} | {{data.pair|Title|Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment}} | ||
{{data.pair|Text|“...barring the complete eradication of [[religion]], we need to [[religion control|change it]] to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of [[America's founding fathers]] may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious [[rationalism]]. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared [[Unitarianism]] the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.”}}<noinclude> | {{data.pair|Text|“...barring the complete eradication of [[religion]], we need to [[religion control|change it]] to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of [[America's founding fathers]] may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious [[rationalism]]. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared [[Unitarianism]] the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.”}}<noinclude> | ||
{{data.link.footer}} | {{data.link.footer}} | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 4 April 2011
<hide> <let name=data index=Date>2007-05-23}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\Age of Enlightenment\active atheism\religion control\PZ Myers/posts}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\Age of Enlightenment\active atheism\religion control\PZ Myers/posts}} <let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/donothing_atheists_and_reignit.php}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CDo-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment}}{{#vardefine:Text|“...barring the complete eradication of religion, we need to change it to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of America's founding fathers may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious rationalism. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared Unitarianism the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“...barring the complete eradication of religion, we need to change it to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of America's founding fathers may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious rationalism. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared Unitarianism the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}