Difference between revisions of "2007-05-23 Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair|URL|2=" to "<let name=data index=URL>")
m (Text replace - "}}<noinclude> {{data.link.footer}} </noinclude>" to "</let> </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> category:batch edit/v1 to v2")
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/donothing_atheists_and_reignit.php}}
 
<let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/donothing_atheists_and_reignit.php}}
 
{{data.pair|Title|Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment}}
 
{{data.pair|Title|Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment}}
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;...barring the complete eradication of [[religion]], we need to [[religion control|change it]] to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of [[America's founding fathers]] may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious [[rationalism]]. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared [[Unitarianism]] the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.&rdquo;}}<noinclude>
+
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;...barring the complete eradication of [[religion]], we need to [[religion control|change it]] to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of [[America's founding fathers]] may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious [[rationalism]]. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared [[Unitarianism]] the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.&rdquo;</let>
{{data.link.footer}}
+
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
</noinclude>
+
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]]

Revision as of 19:36, 4 April 2011