Difference between revisions of "2007-05-23 Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - "}}<noinclude> {{data.link.footer}} </noinclude>" to "</let> </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> category:batch edit/v1 to v2") |
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair\|(.*)\|(.*)}}" to "<let name=data index=$1>$2</let>") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
<let name=data index=Date>2007-05-23}} | <let name=data index=Date>2007-05-23}} | ||
− | + | <let name=data index=Topics>\Age of Enlightenment\active atheism\religion control\PZ Myers/posts</let> | |
<let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/donothing_atheists_and_reignit.php}} | <let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/donothing_atheists_and_reignit.php}} | ||
− | + | <let name=data index=Title>Do-nothing atheists and re-igniting the Enlightenment</let> | |
{{data.pair|Text|“...barring the complete eradication of [[religion]], we need to [[religion control|change it]] to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of [[America's founding fathers]] may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious [[rationalism]]. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared [[Unitarianism]] the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.”</let> | {{data.pair|Text|“...barring the complete eradication of [[religion]], we need to [[religion control|change it]] to accommodate the modern world. I'll add, though, that other countries did set up state religions, and then seem to have modified that institution into similarly benign forms that have had a more lasting effect. The unofficial position of [[America's founding fathers]] may have been wonderfully positive in the beginning, but we can see now that they flopped mightily at building enduring institutions that would maintain any kind of religious [[rationalism]]. I tend to think that if they had, for instance, declared [[Unitarianism]] the official US religion (with the same strong statements that religion was not to be a prerequisite for holding office, etc., and that it was not a declaration of exclusivity) we'd be better off today. There'd at least be one officially sanctioned brake on the excesses of our wildly proliferating looney-tunes churches.”</let> | ||
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | ||
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] | [[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] |