Difference between revisions of "2008-01-23 Rosenhouse on ID's Predictions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (topics lowercase) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | < | + | <hide> |
| − | + | <let name=data index=Date>2008-01-23</let> | |
| − | + | <let name=data index=Source>Talk To Action</let> | |
| − | + | <let name=data index=Author>Ed Brayton</let> | |
| − | + | <let name=data index=Topics>\intelligent design/objections\war on science\Denyse O'Leary</let> | |
| − | {{ | + | <let name=data index=URL>http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/1/23/23511/5460</let> |
| − | </noinclude> | + | <let name=data index=TitlePlain>Rosenhouse on ID's Predictions</let> |
| + | <let name=data index=Title>Rosenhouse on ID's "Predictions"</let> | ||
| + | <let name=data index=TextShort>“O'Leary's predictions, on the other hand, are exactly what we have come to expect from ID advocates - nothing but [[god of the gaps]] arguments whose only predictions are that evolution will fail to explain this or that phenomenon.”</let> | ||
| + | <let name=data index=Text> | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | <p>Jason Rosenhouse has an excellent post about [[Denyse O'Leary]]'s list of [[intelligent design|ID]]'s alleged predictions. As Jason points out, a prediction in [[science]] is how you test a [[scientific theory|theory]]. Most predictions are about the nature of [[evidence]] that has yet to be found, and he mentions [[wikipedia:Tiktaalik|Tiktaalik]] as an excellent example of such a prediction. [[Evolution]] has been remarkably successful at making such predictions.</p> | ||
| + | <p>O'Leary's predictions, on the other hand, are exactly what we have come to expect from ID advocates - nothing but [[god of the gaps]] arguments whose only predictions are that evolution will fail to explain this or that phenomenon.</p> | ||
| + | </blockquote></let> | ||
| + | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | ||