Difference between revisions of "2008-04-19 FBI Abuse of National Security Letters"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://www.issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms)
 
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:34, 25 July 2008

{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{#vardefine:Date|2008-04-19}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Date}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|2008-04-19}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|[[{{#var:Date}}]]}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\USA PATRIOT Act\FBI\North Carolina State University\Robert Mueller}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\USA PATRIOT Act\FBI\North Carolina State University\Robert Mueller}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/fbi-abuse-of-national-security-letters-new-revelations/}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/fbi-abuse-of-national-security-letters-new-revelations/}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CFBI Abuse of “National Security Letters” — New Revelations}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|FBI Abuse of “National Security Letters” — New Revelations}}{{#vardefine:Text|“Incredibly, the Bureau delayed its own investigation in North Carolina "by forcing a field agent to return documents acquired from a U.S. university," Ryan Singel reports. "Why? Because the agent received the documents through a lawful subpoena, while headquarters wanted him to demand the records under the USA Patriot Act, using a power the FBI did not have, but desperately wanted. .. When a North Carolina State University lawyer correctly rejected the second records demand, the FBI obtained another subpoena. Two weeks later, the delay was cited by FBI director Robert Mueller in congressional testimony as proof that the USA Patriot Act needed to be expanded.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“Incredibly, the Bureau delayed its own investigation in North Carolina "by forcing a field agent to return documents acquired from a U.S. university," Ryan Singel reports. "Why? Because the agent received the documents through a lawful subpoena, while headquarters wanted him to demand the records under the USA Patriot Act, using a power the FBI did not have, but desperately wanted. .. When a North Carolina State University lawyer correctly rejected the second records demand, the FBI obtained another subpoena. Two weeks later, the delay was cited by FBI director Robert Mueller in congressional testimony as proof that the USA Patriot Act needed to be expanded.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}

  • Topic pages:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}
  • Topic categories:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}