Difference between revisions of "2008-05-14 Yes, Virginia, There is a War on Science"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://www.issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms)
 
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:50, 25 July 2008

{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{#vardefine:Date|2008-05-14}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Date}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|2008-05-14}}{{#vardefine:Date.disp|[[{{#var:Date}}]]}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\war on science\Chris Mooney}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\war on science\Chris Mooney}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/05/there-is-a-war-on-science/}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/05/there-is-a-war-on-science/}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CYes, Virginia, There is a War on Science}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|Yes, Virginia, There is a War on Science}}{{#vardefine:Text|“Setting out to debunk the idea that there really is a “war on science” coming from the right, these writers don’t bother engaging on the facts of the case at all. They don’t attempt to show that, say, conservative anti-evolutionists are right, or that conservative global warming deniers know what they’re talking about. Instead, Levin and Gerson ignore, trivialize, and even mock the very serious argument that scientific information has been systematically mistreated under this administration and by the American political right. Here’s Gerson: “There are few things in American politics more irrationally ideological, more fanatically faith-based, than the accusation that Republicans are conducting a ‘war on science.’” As for Levin: “Beneath these grave accusations, it turns out, are some remarkably flimsy grievances, most of which seem to amount to political disputes about policy questions in which science plays a role.” .. And that’s it for these authors—rather than taking apart the “war on science” argument, they simply assert with a wave of the hand that we’re all confused, that the facts of science aren’t under attack from the right, it’s just that disagreements have occurred over ethics and policies.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“Setting out to debunk the idea that there really is a “war on science” coming from the right, these writers don’t bother engaging on the facts of the case at all. They don’t attempt to show that, say, conservative anti-evolutionists are right, or that conservative global warming deniers know what they’re talking about. Instead, Levin and Gerson ignore, trivialize, and even mock the very serious argument that scientific information has been systematically mistreated under this administration and by the American political right. Here’s Gerson: “There are few things in American politics more irrationally ideological, more fanatically faith-based, than the accusation that Republicans are conducting a ‘war on science.’” As for Levin: “Beneath these grave accusations, it turns out, are some remarkably flimsy grievances, most of which seem to amount to political disputes about policy questions in which science plays a role.” .. And that’s it for these authors—rather than taking apart the “war on science” argument, they simply assert with a wave of the hand that we’re all confused, that the facts of science aren’t under attack from the right, it’s just that disagreements have occurred over ethics and policies.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}

  • Topic pages:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}
  • Topic categories:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}