Difference between revisions of "2009-04-03 Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(The O-Zone weighs in, 5/5) |
("conspiracy theory" talk) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* '''2009-04-17''' [[The Young Turks]] [http://www.theyoungturks.com/story/2009/4/17/214329/289/Diary/9-scientists-find-Nano-Thermite-Explosive-in-9-11-samples 9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 sample]: post comments include back and forth between one pro-anomalist who seems to make sense, and a small handful of [[concern troll|troll]]s who make tentative pecks at refutation and then result to emotional arguments and invective when challenged | * '''2009-04-17''' [[The Young Turks]] [http://www.theyoungturks.com/story/2009/4/17/214329/289/Diary/9-scientists-find-Nano-Thermite-Explosive-in-9-11-samples 9 scientists find Nano-Thermite Explosive in 9/11 sample]: post comments include back and forth between one pro-anomalist who seems to make sense, and a small handful of [[concern troll|troll]]s who make tentative pecks at refutation and then result to emotional arguments and invective when challenged | ||
* '''2009-05-05''' [[Herald.ie]] [http://www.herald.ie/entertainment/around-town/the-ozone-05052009-1728871.html The O-Zone] (regular column): "Needless to say, the story hasn't been widely reported anywhere in the mainstream media. Not possessed of the expertise to understand the science, The O-Zone can't really comment on the veracity of their claims. However, I found an online TV News interview on Denmark's national station with one of the main physicists, and he made a very interesting comment: "Two airplanes hit two skyscrapers on 9/11 -- yet three skyscrapers collapsed that day. Symmetrically." (Another building, WTC7, collapsed that day). .. Conspiracy theory? Of course -- yet another one. But anybody who still believes the official Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld version of events truly needs their head examined." | * '''2009-05-05''' [[Herald.ie]] [http://www.herald.ie/entertainment/around-town/the-ozone-05052009-1728871.html The O-Zone] (regular column): "Needless to say, the story hasn't been widely reported anywhere in the mainstream media. Not possessed of the expertise to understand the science, The O-Zone can't really comment on the veracity of their claims. However, I found an online TV News interview on Denmark's national station with one of the main physicists, and he made a very interesting comment: "Two airplanes hit two skyscrapers on 9/11 -- yet three skyscrapers collapsed that day. Symmetrically." (Another building, WTC7, collapsed that day). .. Conspiracy theory? Of course -- yet another one. But anybody who still believes the official Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld version of events truly needs their head examined." | ||
| − | ** '''2009-05-05''' [http://www.911blogger.com/node/20048 commentary] | + | ** '''2009-05-05''' [http://www.911blogger.com/node/20048 commentary], including much discussion of the pejorative use of the phrase "[[conspiracy theory]]" and possibilities for counteracting such use |
Publication of this paper appears to have sparked efforts by some editors at [[Wikipedia]] to [[9-11/anomalies/denial|dismiss]] criticism of the official account of events on 9/11: [[2009-04-06 Wikipedia editors livid over new paper]]. References to the paper were reportedly removed, with the justification that [[The Open Chemical Physics Journal]] is not a reliable or mainstream source for scientific information.</let> | Publication of this paper appears to have sparked efforts by some editors at [[Wikipedia]] to [[9-11/anomalies/denial|dismiss]] criticism of the official account of events on 9/11: [[2009-04-06 Wikipedia editors livid over new paper]]. References to the paper were reportedly removed, with the justification that [[The Open Chemical Physics Journal]] is not a reliable or mainstream source for scientific information.</let> | ||