Difference between revisions of "2009-07-01 I was wondering about that"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (date correction) |
m (notes - PZ did get a copy) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<p>The focus of his ire? [[2008 sacred wafer scandal|Crackergate]]. He regards destroying a [[sacred]] symbol to be inflammatory and obnoxious, completely ignoring the insanity it exposed. That insanity – and I am not using that word casually – is what Mooney thinks the spokespeople for science in our country ought to treat deferentially.</p> | <p>The focus of his ire? [[2008 sacred wafer scandal|Crackergate]]. He regards destroying a [[sacred]] symbol to be inflammatory and obnoxious, completely ignoring the insanity it exposed. That insanity – and I am not using that word casually – is what Mooney thinks the spokespeople for science in our country ought to treat deferentially.</p> | ||
| − | </blockquote></let> | + | </blockquote> |
| + | '''Notes''': | ||
| + | * PZ did in fact receive a copy from the authors, one week later</let> | ||
<let name=data index=TextShort>“The focus of his ire? [[2008 sacred wafer scandal|Crackergate]]. He regards destroying a [[sacred]] symbol to be inflammatory and obnoxious, completely ignoring the insanity it exposed. That insanity – and I am not using that word casually – is what Mooney thinks the spokespeople for science in our country ought to treat deferentially.”</let> | <let name=data index=TextShort>“The focus of his ire? [[2008 sacred wafer scandal|Crackergate]]. He regards destroying a [[sacred]] symbol to be inflammatory and obnoxious, completely ignoring the insanity it exposed. That insanity – and I am not using that word casually – is what Mooney thinks the spokespeople for science in our country ought to treat deferentially.”</let> | ||
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | ||