Difference between revisions of "2010-01-29 Rebutting (Again!) the 9/11 Truthers/woozle"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(internal links for clarity (especially the one back to the article-link page)... and a category) |
(removed link to decommissioned "debunking" page... maybe it should exist again, later, with more focused content) |
||
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
A brief aside: The whole thing with [[Brent Blanchard]], [[Protec Documentation Services|Protec]], and [[ImplosionWorld]] is a bit peculiar. Ignoring the obvious ties between the three of them, what we do have is | A brief aside: The whole thing with [[Brent Blanchard]], [[Protec Documentation Services|Protec]], and [[ImplosionWorld]] is a bit peculiar. Ignoring the obvious ties between the three of them, what we do have is | ||
* A company claiming to be internationally prominent in the field of explosive demolition | * A company claiming to be internationally prominent in the field of explosive demolition | ||
| − | * An online magazine widely cited by | + | * An online magazine widely cited by 9-11 debunkers and often [[wikipedia:Special:Search/ImplosionWorld|referenced on Wikipedia]] (in relation to 9/11 and other things) |
...yet no major source, including Wikipedia and SourceWatch, seems to know anything about them. Wikipedia's article on [[wikipedia:building implosion|building implosion]] references Blanchard as a source, but says nothing about his standing in the field. | ...yet no major source, including Wikipedia and SourceWatch, seems to know anything about them. Wikipedia's article on [[wikipedia:building implosion|building implosion]] references Blanchard as a source, but says nothing about his standing in the field. | ||