Difference between revisions of "2010-01-29 Rebutting (Again!) the 9/11 Truthers/woozle"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(saving draft)
 
m (misplaced parenthesis closing)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
** '''False''': He has ''responded'' to them in the past, but his previous responses looked every bit as irrational as this one.
 
** '''False''': He has ''responded'' to them in the past, but his previous responses looked every bit as irrational as this one.
 
* '''Truthers believe that the US government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks.'''
 
* '''Truthers believe that the US government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks.'''
** '''Distortion''': Many truthers do believe this, but they are aware that the evidence is (so far weak) -- and it is not the core position of the [[9-11/truth|9/11 Truth movement]], which is basically that the [[9-11/official|official story]] is substantially incorrect and there needs to be a proper investigation to determine the truth.
+
** '''Distortion''': Many truthers do believe this, but they are aware that the evidence is (so far) weak -- and it is not the core position of the [[9-11/truth|9/11 Truth movement]], which is basically that the [[9-11/official|official story]] is substantially incorrect and there needs to be a proper investigation to determine the truth.
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>

Revision as of 02:35, 3 February 2010