Difference between revisions of "9-11/evidence/temperatures"
(→About: new information) |
(→Comparison Table: Eager 2001 is a source for some numbers; added some more numbers too) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| 400 || ''752'' || in Japan, the critical temperature is apparently considered to be below this | | 400 || ''752'' || in Japan, the critical temperature is apparently considered to be below this | ||
| from {{wikipedia|Structural_steel#Fire_resistance}}, no source | | from {{wikipedia|Structural_steel#Fire_resistance}}, no source | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 425 || ''800'' || structural steel begins to soften | ||
+ | | [[2001-12 Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse|Eagar 2001]] | ||
+ | |- 500 || || max temperature for typical residential fire (lower estimate) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''538'' || 1000 || lower end of critical temperature in China, Europe and North America (e.g., ASTM E-119) | | ''538'' || 1000 || lower end of critical temperature in China, Europe and North America (e.g., ASTM E-119) | ||
| {{wikipedia|Structural_steel#Fire_resistance}} citing offline source | | {{wikipedia|Structural_steel#Fire_resistance}} citing offline source | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || 1200 || structural steel loses half its strength | + | | ''650'' || 1200 || max temperature for typical residential fire (upper estimate) |
− | | | + | | [[2001-12 Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse|Eagar 2001]] |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | ''650'' || 1200 || structural steel loses half its strength | ||
+ | | [[2001-12 Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse|Eagar 2001]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || 1300 || upper end of critical temperature in China, Europe and North America (e.g., ASTM E-119) | + | | ''700'' || 1300 || upper end of critical temperature in China, Europe and North America (e.g., ASTM E-119) |
|{{wikipedia|Structural_steel#Fire_resistance}} citing offline source | |{{wikipedia|Structural_steel#Fire_resistance}} citing offline source | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || 1700 || maximum temperature of open flame | + | | ''800'' || || unlikely that WTC steel experienced temperatures higher than this |
+ | | [[2001-12 Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse|Eagar 2001]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | ''930'' || 1700 || maximum temperature of open flame | ||
| ? | | ? | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || 1800 || hottest temperature claimed in NIST report (not supported by their own metallurgic analysis of actual samples) | + | | ''982'' || 1800 || hottest temperature claimed in NIST report (not supported by their own metallurgic analysis of actual samples) |
| somewhere in [[9-11/official/reports/NIST|NIST]] | | somewhere in [[9-11/official/reports/NIST|NIST]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || 2000 || fire-rating of steel used in WTC construction, good for 6 hours | + | | ''1093'' || 2000 || fire-rating of steel used in WTC construction, good for 6 hours |
| ? | | ? | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
There may be some additional information in [[2001-12 Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse|Eagar 2001]]. | There may be some additional information in [[2001-12 Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse|Eagar 2001]]. |
Revision as of 23:40, 30 July 2011
About
For now, this is a collection of notes about temperatures believed to have been achieved within the WTC fires, and temperatures at which various things happen to materials (especially structural steel) known to have been used in the WTC construction, for comparison purposes.
These figures are preliminary; sources need to be found, and these numbers need to be compared with figures found in other 9/11 literature (official and otherwise).
See also: Issuepedia:Archive/Corus Construction/fire/6. Steelwork Fire Resistance for some data on how steel's strength changes with temperature.
Definitions
Critical temperature is the temperature at which a structural element cannot safely support its load. (Presumably the size of "load" is based on a rating for that particular material.) This temperature is often defined as the temperature at which the element's yield stress has been reduced to 60% of the room temperature yield stress.
Comparison Table
Numbers in italics have been converted from figures given in the other measure of temperature.
°C | °F | description | source |
---|---|---|---|
452 | hottest temperature achieved in samples metallurgically analyzed by NIST (the samples analyzed were those believed to have been closest to the hottest parts of the fire) | somewhere in NIST | |
400 | 752 | in Japan, the critical temperature is apparently considered to be below this | from Wikipedia, no source |
425 | 800 | structural steel begins to soften | Eagar 2001 |
538 | 1000 | lower end of critical temperature in China, Europe and North America (e.g., ASTM E-119) | Wikipedia citing offline source |
650 | 1200 | max temperature for typical residential fire (upper estimate) | Eagar 2001 |
650 | 1200 | structural steel loses half its strength | Eagar 2001 |
700 | 1300 | upper end of critical temperature in China, Europe and North America (e.g., ASTM E-119) | Wikipedia citing offline source |
800 | unlikely that WTC steel experienced temperatures higher than this | Eagar 2001 | |
930 | 1700 | maximum temperature of open flame | ? |
982 | 1800 | hottest temperature claimed in NIST report (not supported by their own metallurgic analysis of actual samples) | somewhere in NIST |
1093 | 2000 | fire-rating of steel used in WTC construction, good for 6 hours | ? |
Notes
There may be some additional information in Eagar 2001.