Difference between revisions of "Atheism vs. religion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (conflicts category) |
m ("conflicts" -> "worldview conflicts") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | [[category:conflicts]]This page is for weighing the relative [[costs and benefits]] of [[atheism]] and [[religion]].{{seed}} | + | [[category:worldview conflicts]]This page is for weighing the relative [[costs and benefits]] of [[atheism]] and [[religion]].{{seed}} |
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
===Opinion=== | ===Opinion=== | ||
* '''2006-12-29''' [http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends] by [[Sam Harris]]: identifies the three basic arguments for religion as (1) religion is true, (2) religion is useful, and (3) atheism is bad, and answers each. | * '''2006-12-29''' [http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends] by [[Sam Harris]]: identifies the three basic arguments for religion as (1) religion is true, (2) religion is useful, and (3) atheism is bad, and answers each. | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 3 September 2007
Overview
This page is for weighing the relative costs and benefits of atheism and religion.
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Links
Opinion
- 2006-12-29 God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends by Sam Harris: identifies the three basic arguments for religion as (1) religion is true, (2) religion is useful, and (3) atheism is bad, and answers each.