Difference between revisions of "DMCA"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Related Links: a2k v DMCA)
(ex-seed; related articles: intellectual property legislation)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Controversial Laws]]
 
{{seed}}
 
 
==Opinionated Summary==
 
==Opinionated Summary==
The [[DMCA|Digital Millennium Copyright Act]] is widely regarded as being one of the most idiotic pieces of technology legislation to come out of the US in recent years. Among other things, the prohibitions it places on any activity which might possibly be interpretable as an attempt to defeat [[Copy Protection|copy-protection]] or [[encryption]] are truly ham fisted:
+
[[Category:Controversial Laws]]The [[DMCA|Digital Millennium Copyright Act]] is widely regarded as being one of the most idiotic pieces of technology legislation to come out of the US in recent years. Among other things, the prohibitions it places on any activity which might possibly be interpretable as an attempt to defeat [[Copy Protection|copy-protection]] or [[encryption]] are truly ham fisted:
 
* Any "technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright" is now illegal under the DMCA; this includes such sophisticated items as magic markers, which can be used to defeat certain CD copy-protection schemes, and t-shirts displaying the DeCSS algorithm (less than one page of C code).
 
* Any "technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright" is now illegal under the DMCA; this includes such sophisticated items as magic markers, which can be used to defeat certain CD copy-protection schemes, and t-shirts displaying the DeCSS algorithm (less than one page of C code).
 
* A [[wikipedia:Dmitry Sklyarov|Russian programmer]] was arrested, after giving a talk at a U.S. programming conference, for developing software to allow Adobe eBooks to be read aloud (which was not illegal in Russia)
 
* A [[wikipedia:Dmitry Sklyarov|Russian programmer]] was arrested, after giving a talk at a U.S. programming conference, for developing software to allow Adobe eBooks to be read aloud (which was not illegal in Russia)
 
* Cryptology research is now seriously hampered by the fact that existing encryption methods may no longer legally be reverse-engineered for analysis. [http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/q22000/gee2000801002022.htm]
 
* Cryptology research is now seriously hampered by the fact that existing encryption methods may no longer legally be reverse-engineered for analysis. [http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/q22000/gee2000801002022.htm]
  
As far as I know, the primary impetus behind the DMCA was media companies trying to prevent anyone from circumventing their [[encryption]]-based [[Copy Protection|copy protection]].
+
As far as I know, the primary impetus behind the DMCA was media companies trying to prevent anyone from circumventing their [[encryption]]-based [[copy protection]].
 
 
 
==Reference==
 
==Reference==
 
*[[wikipedia:Digital Millennium Copyright Act|Wikipedia]]
 
*[[wikipedia:Digital Millennium Copyright Act|Wikipedia]]
 
*[http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/ EFF on the DMCA]
 
*[http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/ EFF on the DMCA]
 +
==Related Articles==
 +
* The [[DMCA]] is [[intellectual property legislation]] primarily concerned with enforcing [[copy protection]] mechanisms by placing legal protections around the secrecy of those mechanisms ([[security by obscurity]])
 
==Related Links==
 
==Related Links==
 
* [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1201: HR 1201] would amend the DMCA to be more reasonable
 
* [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1201: HR 1201] would amend the DMCA to be more reasonable
 
** [https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr012=u4sq34bp31.app8a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=115 letter-writing campaign] at the EFF
 
** [https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr012=u4sq34bp31.app8a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=115 letter-writing campaign] at the EFF
 
* [http://www.lucychili.blogspot.com/ A2K v DMCA in Australia]: blog about similar legislation in Australia and other countries
 
* [http://www.lucychili.blogspot.com/ A2K v DMCA in Australia]: blog about similar legislation in Australia and other countries
 
 
==News==
 
==News==
 
* '''2006-02-16''' [http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004414.php DMCA Used to Block Cellphone Secondary Market], among other more obvious uses
 
* '''2006-02-16''' [http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004414.php DMCA Used to Block Cellphone Secondary Market], among other more obvious uses

Revision as of 01:25, 7 August 2006

Opinionated Summary

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is widely regarded as being one of the most idiotic pieces of technology legislation to come out of the US in recent years. Among other things, the prohibitions it places on any activity which might possibly be interpretable as an attempt to defeat copy-protection or encryption are truly ham fisted:

  • Any "technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright" is now illegal under the DMCA; this includes such sophisticated items as magic markers, which can be used to defeat certain CD copy-protection schemes, and t-shirts displaying the DeCSS algorithm (less than one page of C code).
  • A Russian programmer was arrested, after giving a talk at a U.S. programming conference, for developing software to allow Adobe eBooks to be read aloud (which was not illegal in Russia)
  • Cryptology research is now seriously hampered by the fact that existing encryption methods may no longer legally be reverse-engineered for analysis. [1]

As far as I know, the primary impetus behind the DMCA was media companies trying to prevent anyone from circumventing their encryption-based copy protection.

Reference

Related Articles

Related Links

News