Difference between revisions of "Fake explanation"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Overview: What makes it go? Energy!)
m (link to new "god did it" page)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]A [[fake explanation]] is anything which sounds like an explanation, or is offered as an explanation, but which does not offer any further understanding even if it might be true.{{seedling}}
 
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]A [[fake explanation]] is anything which sounds like an explanation, or is offered as an explanation, but which does not offer any further understanding even if it might be true.{{seedling}}
  
"Because God did it" is one example commonly used in [[religion]]-based arguments. The question-and-answer pair "What makes it go? Energy!", found in an elementary school science textbook, was derided by the late [[Nobel Prize]]-winning physicist [[Richard Feynman]] as being utterly useless as an explanation.
+
Many [[fake explanation]]s are also [[curiosity stopper]]s.
 +
===Examples===
 +
* "Because [[God did it]]" is one example commonly used in [[religion]]-based arguments.
 +
* The question-and-answer pair "What makes it go? Energy!", found in an elementary school science textbook, was derided by the late [[Nobel Prize]]-winning physicist [[Richard Feynman]] as being utterly useless as an explanation.
  
 
''Probably most often in the form of a [[non sequitur]], but I don't have time to check into this at the moment. -[[User:Woozle|W]].''
 
''Probably most often in the form of a [[non sequitur]], but I don't have time to check into this at the moment. -[[User:Woozle|W]].''

Revision as of 01:28, 10 May 2009

Overview

A fake explanation is anything which sounds like an explanation, or is offered as an explanation, but which does not offer any further understanding even if it might be true.

This is a growing seedling article. You can help Issuepedia by watering it.

Many fake explanations are also curiosity stoppers.

Examples

  • "Because God did it" is one example commonly used in religion-based arguments.
  • The question-and-answer pair "What makes it go? Energy!", found in an elementary school science textbook, was derided by the late Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman as being utterly useless as an explanation.

Probably most often in the form of a non sequitur, but I don't have time to check into this at the moment. -W.

Links