Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:Filing Room/to file/2021"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 189: Line 189:
 
** https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/1/18/2010184/-Confederate-flag-waving-traitor-arrested-after-his-ankle-bracelet-puts-him-inside-the-Capitol
 
** https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/1/18/2010184/-Confederate-flag-waving-traitor-arrested-after-his-ankle-bracelet-puts-him-inside-the-Capitol
 
* https://gomox.medium.com/google-safe-browsing-can-kill-your-startup-7d73c474b98d
 
* https://gomox.medium.com/google-safe-browsing-can-kill-your-startup-7d73c474b98d
 +
* https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/16/politics/fact-check-dale-top-15-donald-trump-lies/index.html

Revision as of 23:55, 19 January 2021

January

1/1 (Fri)

1/2 (Sat)

1/3 (Sun)

1/4 (Mon)

1/5 (Tue)

1/6 (Wed)

1/7 (Thu)

1/8 (Fri)

1/9 (Sat)

1/10 (Sun)

1/11 (Mon)

1/12 (Tue)

1/13 (Wed)

to post somewhere

(From Discord on 2021-01-10:

So now I've thought of two ways right-wingism gets its hooks into people:

  • appeals to comforting beliefs: yes, you are in control of your life, you deserve everything you have, anyone who worked as hard as you would have achieved the same thing -- therefore anyone who isn't doing well is pretty much to blame for that (the Cult of Personal Responsibility)
  • appeals to vanity: by always questioning any conclusion which is either widely accepted or seemingly inescapable, you are proving that you are cleverer and more open-minded than the Sheeple -- and you can prove your worthiness and non-sheeplyness by repeating ideas which articulately take down such widely-accepted and/or inescapable conclusions, regardless of whether those arguments make sense on closer examination, in the name of being sure to question everything and examine all sides (Cheap Talk Skepticism)(edited)

1/14 (Thu)

1/15 (Fri)

1/16 (Sat)

1/17 (Sun)

1/18 (Mon)

1/19 (Tue)