Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:Filing Room/to file/2021"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 225: Line 225:
 
** https://www.businessinsider.com/before-dr-seuss-was-famous-he-drew-these-sad-racist-ads-2012-3#this-was-drawn-during-world-war-ii-8 - more on Seuss
 
** https://www.businessinsider.com/before-dr-seuss-was-famous-he-drew-these-sad-racist-ads-2012-3#this-was-drawn-during-world-war-ii-8 - more on Seuss
 
* http://peerproduction.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/anti-colonial-hacking-draft.pdf
 
* http://peerproduction.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/anti-colonial-hacking-draft.pdf
 +
** https://octodon.social/@lichen/105617356397966094

Revision as of 17:12, 27 January 2021

January

1/1 (Fri)

1/2 (Sat)

1/3 (Sun)

1/4 (Mon)

1/5 (Tue)

1/6 (Wed)

1/7 (Thu)

1/8 (Fri)

1/9 (Sat)

1/10 (Sun)

1/11 (Mon)

1/12 (Tue)

1/13 (Wed)

to post somewhere

(From Discord on 2021-01-10:

So now I've thought of two ways right-wingism gets its hooks into people:

  • appeals to comforting beliefs: yes, you are in control of your life, you deserve everything you have, anyone who worked as hard as you would have achieved the same thing -- therefore anyone who isn't doing well is pretty much to blame for that (the Cult of Personal Responsibility)
  • appeals to vanity: by always questioning any conclusion which is either widely accepted or seemingly inescapable, you are proving that you are cleverer and more open-minded than the Sheeple -- and you can prove your worthiness and non-sheeplyness by repeating ideas which articulately take down such widely-accepted and/or inescapable conclusions, regardless of whether those arguments make sense on closer examination, in the name of being sure to question everything and examine all sides (Cheap Talk Skepticism)(edited)

1/14 (Thu)

1/15 (Fri)

1/16 (Sat)

1/17 (Sun)

1/18 (Mon)

1/19 (Tue)

1/20 (Wed)

1/21 (Thu)

1/24 (Sun)

1/25 (Mon)

1/27 (Wed)