Difference between revisions of "Lawrence Lessig/blog/2002/09/13/2122"

From Issuepedia
< Lawrence Lessig‎ | blog‎ | 2002‎ | 09
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(hope I got the right article in RedHerring; the old link didn't work)
 
(smw update)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#set:thing type=blog post}}
+
{{page/blog post}}
* '''Title''': [[post title::where in the network? ]]
+
* '''Title''': [[title::where in the network? ]]
* '''Date''': [[post time::2002-09-13 21:22]]
+
* '''Date''': [[when posted::2002-09-13 21:22]]
 
* '''Author''': [[author::Lawrence Lessig]]
 
* '''Author''': [[author::Lawrence Lessig]]
 
* '''Source''': [[original URL::http://lessig.org/blog/2002/09/where_in_the_network.html|lessig.org]]
 
* '''Source''': [[original URL::http://lessig.org/blog/2002/09/where_in_the_network.html|lessig.org]]
{{subpage}}
 
 
----
 
----
 
Right-to-tinker maven Ed Felton is skeptical that copyprotection would be placed [http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000079.html in the network]. "From an engineer standpoint, that assumption looks wrong to me," he says. But what if we looked at Fritz "not an engineer" Holling's perspective? The point of my [http://www.redherring.com/Home/8835 article] is that Congress is pushing copyprotection in the network, whatever engineers would argue is ideal. A differend DRM would undermine that push. (But so too would a different Congress for that matter.)
 
Right-to-tinker maven Ed Felton is skeptical that copyprotection would be placed [http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000079.html in the network]. "From an engineer standpoint, that assumption looks wrong to me," he says. But what if we looked at Fritz "not an engineer" Holling's perspective? The point of my [http://www.redherring.com/Home/8835 article] is that Congress is pushing copyprotection in the network, whatever engineers would argue is ideal. A differend DRM would undermine that push. (But so too would a different Congress for that matter.)

Latest revision as of 21:18, 28 August 2011


Right-to-tinker maven Ed Felton is skeptical that copyprotection would be placed in the network. "From an engineer standpoint, that assumption looks wrong to me," he says. But what if we looked at Fritz "not an engineer" Holling's perspective? The point of my article is that Congress is pushing copyprotection in the network, whatever engineers would argue is ideal. A differend DRM would undermine that push. (But so too would a different Congress for that matter.)