Difference between revisions of "Morality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Value Dichotomies: and stuff and things) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Value Dichotomies== | ==Value Dichotomies== | ||
Most moral systems weigh in somewhere between the two extremes for each of these, but the differences in opinion between one system and another are significant. The following principles may or may not be truly basic, but they at least are closer to being ''principles'' than they are opinions about specific issues. | Most moral systems weigh in somewhere between the two extremes for each of these, but the differences in opinion between one system and another are significant. The following principles may or may not be truly basic, but they at least are closer to being ''principles'' than they are opinions about specific issues. | ||
| − | * | + | * '''Human nature is essentially''': good or evil (not ''quite'' the same as Hobbes vs. Rousseau; see below) |
| − | * Property rights: personal property is sacrosanct vs. all property should be held in common | + | * '''Human nature comes from''': genetics and other factors fixed at birth ("nature") vs. training and learning after birth ("nurture") |
| − | + | * '''Property rights''': personal property is sacrosanct (propertarianism) vs. all property should be held in common | |
| − | '' | + | * '''Power''': absolutism ([[Wikipedia:Thomas Hobbes|Hobbes]]: "abuses of power by [legitimate] authority are to be accepted as the price of peace") vs. [[Wikipedia:Separation of powers|separation of powers]] and [[Wikipedia:social contract|social contract]]s ([[Wikipedia:Jean-Jacques Rousseau|Rousseau]]). This may be a restatement of Brin's question "To what degree should the state or party have to power to coerce cooperation?", or it may be subtly different. |
| + | ===Other Possibilities=== | ||
| + | I'm throwing these in for further discussion because it's not clear to me whether they are basic or merely corrolaries/combinations of other dichotomies: | ||
| + | * Moral externalism (important truths are discovered by observing reality) vs. moral internalism (important truths are discovered by meditation, reflection, prayer) vs. moral dogmatism (important truths come only from the wisdom of the past) | ||
| + | * Moral absolutism vs. eternal questioning in the face of new evidence | ||
| + | ==Related Reading== | ||
| + | * David Brin's reply to other replies in [http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2005/12/response-to-our-anonymous-modernist.html#113416439173168516 Response to our anonymous modernist] "I have my own favorite 3-D coordinate system", which consists of the Property Rights, Power (maybe), and Nature-vs.-Nurture dichotomies | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 11 December 2005
Morality refers to either (1) any particular system of ethics, or (2) the question of whether given acts are considered innately right or wrong within a given moral system (the morality of a particular act). In order to minimize confusion, we will use the phrase "moral system" when meaning #1 is intended.
Reference
Purpose
Issuepedia is particularly concerned with values which define particular moral systems. These values are not generally subject to rational debate; what is more useful is to attempt to determine:
- meta-rules by which people with different moral systems can get along.
- where the basic differences lie between moral systems (e.g. if two people disagree about some immediate issue, such as "the death penalty", what are the basic irreducible principles upon which each person is basing their point of view?)
Value Dichotomies
Most moral systems weigh in somewhere between the two extremes for each of these, but the differences in opinion between one system and another are significant. The following principles may or may not be truly basic, but they at least are closer to being principles than they are opinions about specific issues.
- Human nature is essentially: good or evil (not quite the same as Hobbes vs. Rousseau; see below)
- Human nature comes from: genetics and other factors fixed at birth ("nature") vs. training and learning after birth ("nurture")
- Property rights: personal property is sacrosanct (propertarianism) vs. all property should be held in common
- Power: absolutism (Hobbes: "abuses of power by [legitimate] authority are to be accepted as the price of peace") vs. separation of powers and social contracts (Rousseau). This may be a restatement of Brin's question "To what degree should the state or party have to power to coerce cooperation?", or it may be subtly different.
Other Possibilities
I'm throwing these in for further discussion because it's not clear to me whether they are basic or merely corrolaries/combinations of other dichotomies:
- Moral externalism (important truths are discovered by observing reality) vs. moral internalism (important truths are discovered by meditation, reflection, prayer) vs. moral dogmatism (important truths come only from the wisdom of the past)
- Moral absolutism vs. eternal questioning in the face of new evidence
Related Reading
- David Brin's reply to other replies in Response to our anonymous modernist "I have my own favorite 3-D coordinate system", which consists of the Property Rights, Power (maybe), and Nature-vs.-Nurture dichotomies