Difference between revisions of "Paul McHugh/gender"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Criticism: ZJ again)
(YouTube link for ZJ's piece)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{seed}}
+
==About==
McHugh has been a reliable source of authoritative-sounding but highly misleading and flawed work in the area of [[gender identity]].
+
McHugh has been a reliable source of authoritative-sounding disinformation in the area of [[gender identity]].
 
==Writings==
 
==Writings==
 
===2016===
 
===2016===
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* '''2004-11''' [https://www.firstthings.com/article/2004/11/surgical-sex Surgical Sex: Why We Stopped Doing Sex Change Operations]: misrepresents transgender people and gender identity; describes transwomen as "caricatures"
 
* '''2004-11''' [https://www.firstthings.com/article/2004/11/surgical-sex Surgical Sex: Why We Stopped Doing Sex Change Operations]: misrepresents transgender people and gender identity; describes transwomen as "caricatures"
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
* '''2016-11-01''' [http://genderanalysis.net/2016/11/paul-mchugh-and-the-johns-hopkins-gender-clinic-the-perils-of-cherry-picking-more-trans-module-2-1/ Paul McHugh and the Johns Hopkins gender clinic: The perils of cherry-picking (More Trans, module 2-1)]
+
* '''2016-11-01''' [http://genderanalysis.net/2016/11/paul-mchugh-and-the-johns-hopkins-gender-clinic-the-perils-of-cherry-picking-more-trans-module-2-1/ Paul McHugh and the Johns Hopkins gender clinic: The perils of cherry-picking (More Trans, module 2-1)] ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQzx_bG1fv4 YouTube])
 
** The Johns Hopkins link is now 404, but [https://web.archive.org/web/20170223083538/http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/lgbt-resources/lgbt-community.html has been archived]. It confirms that JH has reconsidered their earlier decision and will once again be offering SRS.
 
** The Johns Hopkins link is now 404, but [https://web.archive.org/web/20170223083538/http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/lgbt-resources/lgbt-community.html has been archived]. It confirms that JH has reconsidered their earlier decision and will once again be offering SRS.
 
* '''2015-09-01''' [http://genderanalysis.net/2015/09/paul-mchugh-is-wrong-transitioning-is-effective-gender-analysis-10/ Paul McHugh is wrong: transitioning is effective (Gender Analysis 10)]: detailed analysis of McHugh's work and the methodology used specifically in the [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/464739 1979 study] to which he frequently refers
 
* '''2015-09-01''' [http://genderanalysis.net/2015/09/paul-mchugh-is-wrong-transitioning-is-effective-gender-analysis-10/ Paul McHugh is wrong: transitioning is effective (Gender Analysis 10)]: detailed analysis of McHugh's work and the methodology used specifically in the [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/464739 1979 study] to which he frequently refers

Revision as of 00:19, 25 June 2020

About

McHugh has been a reliable source of authoritative-sounding disinformation in the area of gender identity.

Writings

2016

Each of these is a page with more information about the item, including criticism:

2015

2004

Criticism