Difference between revisions of "Poe's Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(more generally... (and a Wikipedia update)) |
(adage -> aphorism; smw) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <hide> | |
| − | [[category: | + | [[page type::article]] |
| + | [[thing type::aphorism]] | ||
| + | [[category:aphorisms]] | ||
| + | </hide> | ||
| + | ==About== | ||
| + | [[Poe's Law]] is an [[aphorism]] which states, in its original form: | ||
<blockquote>Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of [[Fundamentalism]] that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing.</blockquote> | <blockquote>Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of [[Fundamentalism]] that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing.</blockquote> | ||
| − | More generally, it refers to any speech which is sufficiently | + | More generally, it refers to any speech which is sufficiently [[dogma]]tic – or sufficiently extreme in its extrapolation of an ideology – as to be indistinguishable from parody. (Such parody would then be a form of [[reductio ad absurdum]].) |
{{seedling}} | {{seedling}} | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
| − | * {{ | + | * {{wikipedia|Poe's law}} |
** as of 2009-06-29, article had been deleted multiple times [[category:Wikipedia/deletions]] | ** as of 2009-06-29, article had been deleted multiple times [[category:Wikipedia/deletions]] | ||
** as of 2009-10-10, redirects to a page which lists Edgar Allen Poe's law "That there is a maximum desirable length for poems". | ** as of 2009-10-10, redirects to a page which lists Edgar Allen Poe's law "That there is a maximum desirable length for poems". | ||
| + | ** as of 2011-01-15, an article on this topic was in place | ||
* {{rationalwiki}} | * {{rationalwiki}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 11 August 2015
About
Poe's Law is an aphorism which states, in its original form:
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing.
More generally, it refers to any speech which is sufficiently dogmatic – or sufficiently extreme in its extrapolation of an ideology – as to be indistinguishable from parody. (Such parody would then be a form of reductio ad absurdum.)
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia
- as of 2009-06-29, article had been deleted multiple times
- as of 2009-10-10, redirects to a page which lists Edgar Allen Poe's law "That there is a maximum desirable length for poems".
- as of 2011-01-15, an article on this topic was in place
- RationalWiki