Difference between revisions of "Talk:2007-12-21 Inhofe recycles unscientific attacks on global warming"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 24.250.70.13 (Talk) to last version by Woozle)
(→‎xgfYzZWeUQbKPQIjW: new section)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Also, [[Ray Kurzweil]] may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.
 
Also, [[Ray Kurzweil]] may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.
 +
 +
== xgfYzZWeUQbKPQIjW ==
 +
 +
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!

Revision as of 22:24, 23 July 2009

Woozle notes

The attack on Freeman Dyson was a bit ad hominem, as there is nothing inherently nonsensical about the idea of a nuke-powered spacecraft; several different versions have been proposed by different people. Unfortunately, all of the ground-launching ones are now banned by international treaty, as I understand it, despite the fact that it might provide substantially cheaper access to space -- something which is desperately needed for a number of reasons.

Also, Ray Kurzweil may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.

xgfYzZWeUQbKPQIjW

Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!