Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bush neoconservative/archive"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
''[ remainder moved ]''
 
''[ remainder moved ]''
 +
 +
==Re: Party Split==
 +
As one caught in the middle, it appears to me that the Democrats are really just that far left. Everything their party does is okay, because they truly believe we should be a socialist nanny state. And while I loathe the direction the Republicans are heading, they still maintain the core issues I believe in: Less taxes (resulting in less government), right to protect myself, etc. It is more and more an issue of the lesser of two extreme evils.
 +
 
==One discussion moved==
 
==One discussion moved==
 
I have moved the remainder of the discussion that was here over to [[Talk:Bill Clinton vs. George W. Bush]], because that seemed to be more the ultimate topic. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 20:04, 13 September 2006 (EDT)
 
I have moved the remainder of the discussion that was here over to [[Talk:Bill Clinton vs. George W. Bush]], because that seemed to be more the ultimate topic. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 20:04, 13 September 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:17, 14 September 2006

Under President Clinton, a similar list could apply to most Democrats. Does that make them "neolibs", "socialists", or is the Democrat party just really that far left?

  • the US Invasion of Iraq (And Haiti, and Somalia, and Bosnia)
  • President William J. Clinton
  • the precedence of presidential authority over constitutional law
  • the actions of the president are above the law (sexual assault, perjury, etc.)
  • big government spending for political ends

Midian 12:06, 30 August 2006 (EDT)

Woozle replies

I'm not sure I am understanding some of your points above. Overall, you seem to be saying that there was a similar breakaway cabal during the Clinton years, and so there should be a similar term for them. However, during the Clinton administration there was not, as far as I am aware, such a huge gap between Democratic/liberal ideals and the actual actions of elected officials in the Democratic party (including Clinton) as there is now between Republican/conservative ideals and the actual actions of elected officials in the Republican party -- especially at the very top. If I need to spell out the details of that gap, please let me know.

[ remainder moved ]

Re: Party Split

As one caught in the middle, it appears to me that the Democrats are really just that far left. Everything their party does is okay, because they truly believe we should be a socialist nanny state. And while I loathe the direction the Republicans are heading, they still maintain the core issues I believe in: Less taxes (resulting in less government), right to protect myself, etc. It is more and more an issue of the lesser of two extreme evils.

One discussion moved

I have moved the remainder of the discussion that was here over to Talk:Bill Clinton vs. George W. Bush, because that seemed to be more the ultimate topic. --Woozle 20:04, 13 September 2006 (EDT)