Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dave Dionisi"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(re-asking (and expansion) of 2nd question)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Question ==
 
== Question ==
 
 
Does the "small group of foreign policy and intelligence professionals..." have a name? Do they formally work together in any sense, or is this more of a descriptive label? --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 18:06, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
 
Does the "small group of foreign policy and intelligence professionals..." have a name? Do they formally work together in any sense, or is this more of a descriptive label? --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 18:06, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
 
+
==Answer==
 
Not to my knowledge -- [[User:Sgl|Sgl]] 18:40, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
 
Not to my knowledge -- [[User:Sgl|Sgl]] 18:40, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
==Question Again==
 +
If they don't work together, then is their description -- "foreign policy and intelligence professionals who publicly oppose the foreign policies of the Bush II administration" -- the only thing they have in common? I'm trying to figure out if this is really what I'd call a "group", or is it more "a number of people with certain qualifications (careers in foreign policy and intelligence) who also take a particular position (against Bush foreign policy)"? If it's more the latter, then I suspect there are actually quite a few people who could be added to the list. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:45, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:45, 30 July 2007

Question

Does the "small group of foreign policy and intelligence professionals..." have a name? Do they formally work together in any sense, or is this more of a descriptive label? --Woozle 18:06, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Answer

Not to my knowledge -- Sgl 18:40, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Question Again

If they don't work together, then is their description -- "foreign policy and intelligence professionals who publicly oppose the foreign policies of the Bush II administration" -- the only thing they have in common? I'm trying to figure out if this is really what I'd call a "group", or is it more "a number of people with certain qualifications (careers in foreign policy and intelligence) who also take a particular position (against Bush foreign policy)"? If it's more the latter, then I suspect there are actually quite a few people who could be added to the list. --Woozle 19:45, 30 July 2007 (EDT)