Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eucharist wafer desecration"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I edited this article because it was clearly biased. I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer". I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist ...)
 
(→‎Thanks!: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I edited this article because it was clearly biased.  I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer".  I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.
 
I edited this article because it was clearly biased.  I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer".  I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.
 +
 +
== Thanks! ==
 +
 +
Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking.
 +
 +
I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:05, 3 August 2008

I edited this article because it was clearly biased. I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer". I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.

Thanks!

Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking.

I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality. --Woozle 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)