From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

All of my Conservapedia contributions are here, assuming they don't end up scrubbing any of them out of the database.


Apparently they only keep about 2 months' worth of revision history for talkpages, which conveniently removes evidence of those troublesome censor-reversions...


I posted a request to list any banned sites and provide a brief explanation of why they are banned.


Karajou reverted my question about why my other edit was reverted. I'm guessing that "RationalWiki" is an automatic revert, although I don't see that rule spelled out anywhere. (I didn't notice this until 7/9.)

Also posted a note here which someone replied to but I didn't see the reply until much later when everything was archived. (Note the interesting comment at the bottom which did not get deleted...)


I posted the following on conservapedia:Talk:Atheism (rev 486830, which seems to be gone as of 2008-09-15):

Also, shouldn't the points raised on R.a.t.i.o.n.a.lWiki about this article be addressed? Why do you have links to R.a.t.i.o.n.a.lWiki – and apparently even any mention of that site – blocked by your spam filter? --woozle 18:34, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

It was reverted by Karajou the next day; I posted a question on Karajou's talkpage asking about the reversion:

Hi, I was just wondering why you reverted my talkpage edit suggesting a rebuttal to RationalWiki's article on Conservapedia's atheism page. Did I violate a rule or something? Thanks. --woozle 12:24, 4 July 2008 (EDT)"

The wording is awkward, made more so by not being able to link to the RationalWiki article by way of clarification.


Some comments on conservapedia:Conservapedia talk:Public Awareness of the Atheism Article‎ and conservapedia:Talk:Atheism‎.