From Issuepedia

All of my Conservapedia contributions are here, assuming they don't end up scrubbing any of them out of the database.


Apparently they only keep about 2 months' worth of revision history for talkpages, which conveniently removes evidence of those troublesome censor-reversions...


I posted a request to list any banned sites and provide a brief explanation of why they are banned.


Karajou reverted my question about why my other edit was reverted. I'm guessing that "RationalWiki" is an automatic revert, although I don't see that rule spelled out anywhere. (I didn't notice this until 7/9.)

Also posted a note here which someone replied to but I didn't see the reply until much later when everything was archived. (Note the interesting comment at the bottom which did not get deleted...)


I posted the following on conservapedia:Talk:Atheism (rev 486830, which seems to be gone as of 2008-09-15):

Also, shouldn't the points raised on R.a.t.i.o.n.a.lWiki about this article be addressed? Why do you have links to R.a.t.i.o.n.a.lWiki – and apparently even any mention of that site – blocked by your spam filter? --woozle 18:34, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

It was reverted by Karajou the next day; I posted a question on Karajou's talkpage asking about the reversion:

Hi, I was just wondering why you reverted my talkpage edit suggesting a rebuttal to RationalWiki's article on Conservapedia's atheism page. Did I violate a rule or something? Thanks. --woozle 12:24, 4 July 2008 (EDT)"

The wording is awkward, made more so by not being able to link to the RationalWiki article by way of clarification.


Some comments on conservapedia:Conservapedia talk:Public Awareness of the Atheism Article‎ and conservapedia:Talk:Atheism‎.