Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/Conservapedia"
(New page: All of my Conservapedia contributions are here, assuming they don't end up scrubbing any of them out of the database. ==2008-07-03== I p...) |
(7/9 update) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
All of my [[Conservapedia]] contributions are [[conservapedia:Special:Contributions/Woozle|here]], assuming they don't end up scrubbing any of them out of the database. | All of my [[Conservapedia]] contributions are [[conservapedia:Special:Contributions/Woozle|here]], assuming they don't end up scrubbing any of them out of the database. | ||
| + | ==2008-07-09== | ||
| + | I posted a [[conservapedia:Conservapedia talk:Commandments|request]] to list any banned sites and provide a brief explanation of why they are banned. | ||
| + | ==2008-07-04== | ||
| + | Karajou reverted my [[conservapedia:User_talk:Karajou&oldid=487267|question]] about why my other edit was reverted. I'm guessing that "RationalWiki" is an automatic revert, although I don't see that rule spelled out anywhere. (I didn't notice this until 7/9.) | ||
==2008-07-03== | ==2008-07-03== | ||
I posted the following on [[conservapedia:Talk:Atheism]] ([[conservapedia:Talk:Atheism&oldid=486830|rev 486830]]): | I posted the following on [[conservapedia:Talk:Atheism]] ([[conservapedia:Talk:Atheism&oldid=486830|rev 486830]]): | ||
Revision as of 23:28, 9 July 2008
All of my Conservapedia contributions are here, assuming they don't end up scrubbing any of them out of the database.
2008-07-09
I posted a request to list any banned sites and provide a brief explanation of why they are banned.
2008-07-04
Karajou reverted my question about why my other edit was reverted. I'm guessing that "RationalWiki" is an automatic revert, although I don't see that rule spelled out anywhere. (I didn't notice this until 7/9.)
2008-07-03
I posted the following on conservapedia:Talk:Atheism (rev 486830):
- Also, shouldn't the points raised on R.a.t.i.o.n.a.lWiki about this article be addressed? Why do you have links to R.a.t.i.o.n.a.lWiki – and apparently even any mention of that site – blocked by your spam filter? --woozle 18:34, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
It was reverted by Karajou the next day; I posted a question on Karajou's talkpage asking about the reversion:
- Hi, I was just wondering why you reverted my talkpage edit suggesting a rebuttal to RationalWiki's article on Conservapedia's atheism page. Did I violate a rule or something? Thanks. --woozle 12:24, 4 July 2008 (EDT)"
The wording is awkward, made more so by not being able to link to the RationalWiki article by way of clarification.
2008-06
Some comments on conservapedia:Conservapedia talk:Public Awareness of the Atheism Article and conservapedia:Talk:Atheism.