Difference between revisions of "2011/07/30/0948/link/woozle"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(saving work)
m (fixed internal link)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[responds to::2011/07/30/0948/link]]
 
[[responds to::2011/07/30/0948/link]]
 
</hide>
 
</hide>
The 2005 ''[[Popular Mechanics]]'' article [[2011/07/30/0948/link|Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report]] is apparently one of the major sources pointed to by [[9/11 anomaly denialist]]s as having definitively "debunked" the idea that the official story of 9/11 is false in any significant way. This page is an analysis of the claims made in that article.
+
The 2005 ''[[Popular Mechanics]]'' article [[2011/07/30/0948/link|Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report]] is apparently one of the major sources pointed to by [[9/11 anomaly denial]]ists as having definitively "debunked" the idea that the official story of 9/11 is false in any significant way. This page is an analysis of the claims made in that article.
  
 
''Popular Mechanics'' apparently also published a [http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/3491861 book] on the same subject, which may be also be deserving of its own analysis.
 
''Popular Mechanics'' apparently also published a [http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/3491861 book] on the same subject, which may be also be deserving of its own analysis.
Line 142: Line 142:
 
'''Paragraph 7''':
 
'''Paragraph 7''':
 
<blockquote>"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."</blockquote>
 
+
----
 
+
''Since 9/11 Research has done a pretty good job of debunking this article, and my time is limited, I'm going to stop here for now. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 21:28, 30 July 2011 (EDT)''
 
 
 
 
{{editing}}
 

Latest revision as of 20:22, 19 March 2013