Difference between revisions of "God/arguments for/Gödel"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '==About== '''Gödel's ontological proof''' is a supposed mathematical proof of the existence of God; it is a formalization of [[../Saint Anselm|Saint Anselm's ontological…')
 
m (fixed character set)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==About==
 
==About==
''''s ontological proof''' is a supposed [[mathematical proof]] of the existence of [[God]]; it is a formalization of [[../Saint Anselm|Saint Anselm's ontological argument]] by legendary mathematician [[Kurt ]].
+
'''Gödel's ontological proof''' is a supposed [[mathematical proof]] of the existence of [[God]]; it is a formalization of [[../Saint Anselm|Saint Anselm's ontological argument]] by legendary mathematician [[Kurt Gödel]].
  
 
However, it is basically wordplay (as are many such proofs) which commits the [[logical fallacy]] of [[assuming the conclusion]].
 
However, it is basically wordplay (as are many such proofs) which commits the [[logical fallacy]] of [[assuming the conclusion]].
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
* {{wikipedia|'s ontological proof}}
+
* {{wikipedia|Gödel's ontological proof}}

Revision as of 16:43, 16 October 2014

About

Gödel's ontological proof is a supposed mathematical proof of the existence of God; it is a formalization of Saint Anselm's ontological argument by legendary mathematician Kurt Gödel.

However, it is basically wordplay (as are many such proofs) which commits the logical fallacy of assuming the conclusion.

Argument

The argument can be paraphrased thusly:

  • The definition of God is that it is an entity possessing only positive qualities.
  • Not existing would be a negative quality.
  • Therefore God must exist.

This boils down to a claim that "If an entity possessing only positive qualities existed, then it couldn't not exist." – which doesn't prove anything at all.

Links

Reference