Difference between revisions of "Thread:Issuepedia talk:Policies/first attempt at "article" page layout standards/policy/reply"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dredmorbius (talk | contribs) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 10:14, 4 March 2015
I'm bringing some Wikipedia / other Wiki site conventions with me.
I like the About section convention for just the reason you state: it creates an independently editable intro section.
But ... I also like having 2nd level headers further down the page to give a strong visual division. If all you've got is "About" ... you're going to be missing that.
I think Wikipedia's standard is for "References" to be footnotes to inline references. "External Links" is other sources, and there's a "See Also" in some pages. I need to confirm.
I'd noted your "to file" classification. I'll need to scope out "News" / "Related".