Difference between revisions of "Thread:Issuepedia talk:Policies/first attempt at "article" page layout standards/policy/reply"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 10:14, 4 March 2015

I'm bringing some Wikipedia / other Wiki site conventions with me.

I like the About section convention for just the reason you state: it creates an independently editable intro section.

But ... I also like having 2nd level headers further down the page to give a strong visual division. If all you've got is "About" ... you're going to be missing that.

I think Wikipedia's standard is for "References" to be footnotes to inline references. "External Links" is other sources, and there's a "See Also" in some pages. I need to confirm.

I'd noted your "to file" classification. I'll need to scope out "News" / "Related".