Difference between revisions of "Clique signal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(another method; example of lexical signalling) |
(motives) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* performing various tribal customs – wearing certain clothing, performing rituals, etc. | * performing various tribal customs – wearing certain clothing, performing rituals, etc. | ||
* discriminating against others whose beliefs appear to conflict with those of one's tribe | * discriminating against others whose beliefs appear to conflict with those of one's tribe | ||
+ | ==Motives== | ||
+ | It seems to be the case that people get into a certain mindset where they confuse ''loyalty to people'' with ''loyalty to ideas'' – they come to believe that if the group believes something, then ''believing something different is somehow a betrayal of the group''. Every discussion becomes an opportunity to proselytize – to defend and spread the belief – rather than a search for truth. Every debate is [[competitive debate|competitive]] rather than truth-seeking. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Counterfactual]] [[belief-system]]s therefore often encourage this sort of thinking, as it is the only way those belief are likely to survive. |
Revision as of 20:25, 11 May 2016
Belief-tribe signalling (or just tribal signalling) is the practice of signalling one's membership in a belief tribe, typically one or more of the following methods:
- firmly proclaiming one's fixed beliefs to others (verbal signalling)
- employing particular words or phrasings common only within the tribe (lexical signalling)
- Example: creationists often talk about "evidences" instead of "evidence"
- performing various tribal customs – wearing certain clothing, performing rituals, etc.
- discriminating against others whose beliefs appear to conflict with those of one's tribe
Motives
It seems to be the case that people get into a certain mindset where they confuse loyalty to people with loyalty to ideas – they come to believe that if the group believes something, then believing something different is somehow a betrayal of the group. Every discussion becomes an opportunity to proselytize – to defend and spread the belief – rather than a search for truth. Every debate is competitive rather than truth-seeking.
Counterfactual belief-systems therefore often encourage this sort of thinking, as it is the only way those belief are likely to survive.