Difference between revisions of "Equating wealth and worth"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::logical fallacy </hide> ==About== Equating wealth and worth is a logical fallacy is in which the wealth a person owns...")
 
m
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[Equating wealth and worth]] is a [[logical fallacy]] is in which the [[wealth]] a person owns, earns, or has accumulated is assumed to be a reasonably accurate representation of their ''worth'' as an individual and therefore presumably also representative of the value their contributions to society.
 
[[Equating wealth and worth]] is a [[logical fallacy]] is in which the [[wealth]] a person owns, earns, or has accumulated is assumed to be a reasonably accurate representation of their ''worth'' as an individual and therefore presumably also representative of the value their contributions to society.
  
This is a special case of the [[fairness fallacy]].
+
This is a special case of the [[fair world fallacy]].

Latest revision as of 12:33, 1 August 2017

About

Equating wealth and worth is a logical fallacy is in which the wealth a person owns, earns, or has accumulated is assumed to be a reasonably accurate representation of their worth as an individual and therefore presumably also representative of the value their contributions to society.

This is a special case of the fair world fallacy.