Difference between revisions of "Equating wealth and worth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::logical fallacy </hide> ==About== Equating wealth and worth is a logical fallacy is in which the wealth a person owns...") |
m |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Equating wealth and worth]] is a [[logical fallacy]] is in which the [[wealth]] a person owns, earns, or has accumulated is assumed to be a reasonably accurate representation of their ''worth'' as an individual and therefore presumably also representative of the value their contributions to society. | [[Equating wealth and worth]] is a [[logical fallacy]] is in which the [[wealth]] a person owns, earns, or has accumulated is assumed to be a reasonably accurate representation of their ''worth'' as an individual and therefore presumably also representative of the value their contributions to society. | ||
− | This is a special case of the [[ | + | This is a special case of the [[fair world fallacy]]. |
Latest revision as of 12:33, 1 August 2017
About
Equating wealth and worth is a logical fallacy is in which the wealth a person owns, earns, or has accumulated is assumed to be a reasonably accurate representation of their worth as an individual and therefore presumably also representative of the value their contributions to society.
This is a special case of the fair world fallacy.