Intellectual property

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Overview

As works of a largely informational nature (art, music, writing, computer programs) become an increasingly significant part of our daily lives and increasingly easier to copy, the traditional rights of the creator to control (and profit from) copying are undergoing intensive re-examination.

Counter-movements have arisen to produce freely-copyable works in all of these categories, the best-known of which is the open source movement.

Technically, pure ideas are not supposed to be copyrightable or patentable; what is protected is the expression of the idea, not the idea itself. In practice, however, patents are being granted for such in large numbers, e.g. the Amazon "one-click checkout" patent.

Related Pages

• Copy Protection is often used to prevent illegal copying of intellectual property.
• Patents are a particular form of intellectual property.
• Illegal copying of intellectual property is often hyperbolically called piracy.

Links

Reference

• Wikipedia

Projects

• Free Culture UK: for the promotion of free (freely copyable) works of art and culture
• The Pirate Party: supporting copyright reform (there are sister sites for several other countries)
• Eric's Commentary on the Shutdown of MathWorld: how an author was sued for copyright infringement of his own work by CRC Press (formerly the Chemical Rubber Company). This is a good illustration of how corporate ownership of copyrights seems to compel agents of said corporations to behave like utter jerks.

News

• Amazon one-click patent:
  • 2007-06-07 Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving
  • 2006-05-16 United States Patent and Trademark Office Orders "One-Click Patent" Reexamination
    • 2007-03-13 The Empire strikes back
• 2004-10-08 Copyright and the Mouse: How Disney's Mickey Mouse Changed the World (alt) by Jack Kapica

Perspectives

• 2007-01-31 The Ecstasy of Influence by Jonathan Lethem: a discoursive investigation into the long-standing cultural practice of copying artistic ideas
• 2007-01-18 Lawyers Starting To Understand The Pointlessness Of Over Aggressive Trademark Enforcement
• 2007-01-11 History Repeats Itself: How The RIAA Is Like 17th Century French Button-Makers
• 2006-11-08 The Importance Of Zero In Destroying The Scarcity Myth Of Economics takes a look at the difficulty of analyzing the economics of a product whose marginal cost is essentially zero. Apparently many pro-DRM folks don't realize (or agree) that many of the analysis models break down under that circumstance, and alternative models are needed.

Satire

• Creators' Rights: underscores the "Millennium" in "Digital Millennium Copyright Act"

Writings

• Intellectual Property Issues by Negativland

Notes

Not sure where things like Creative Commons fall in the "movement" scheme; are they aligned with open source in any way? Should I be saying "counter-movements" (plural) or "a counter movenent" (singular)? Is there a more general "openness" movement which embraces things like open business? Is "open source" related to transparency, and if so how? --Woozle 15:08, 2 July 2006 (EDT)