Difference between revisions of "Intellectual property"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Related Pages: link to "piracy" page)
(→‎News: amazon one-click patent links)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/about/erics_commentary.html Eric's Commentary on the Shutdown of MathWorld]: how an author was sued for copyright infringement of his own work by [[CRC Press]] (formerly the Chemical Rubber Company). This is a good illustration of how [[corporate]] ownership of copyrights seems to compel agents of said corporations to behave like utter jerks.
 
* [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/about/erics_commentary.html Eric's Commentary on the Shutdown of MathWorld]: how an author was sued for copyright infringement of his own work by [[CRC Press]] (formerly the Chemical Rubber Company). This is a good illustration of how [[corporate]] ownership of copyrights seems to compel agents of said corporations to behave like utter jerks.
 
===News===
 
===News===
 +
* [[Amazon one-click patent]]:
 +
** '''2007-06-07''' [http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070607-amazon-one-click-patent-extended-to-gift-giving.html Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving]
 +
** '''2006-05-16''' [http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2006/05/united-states-patent-and-trademark.html United States Patent and Trademark Office Orders "One-Click Patent" Reexamination]
 +
*** '''2007-03-13''' [http://igdmlgd.blogspot.com/2007/03/empire-strikes-back.html The Empire strikes back]
 
* '''2004-10-08''' [http://www.mickeynews.com/News/PrintStory.asp_Q_id_E_1084Copyright_A_cat_E_DC Copyright and the Mouse: How Disney's Mickey Mouse Changed the World] ([http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/?articleID=4031 alt]) by Jack Kapica
 
* '''2004-10-08''' [http://www.mickeynews.com/News/PrintStory.asp_Q_id_E_1084Copyright_A_cat_E_DC Copyright and the Mouse: How Disney's Mickey Mouse Changed the World] ([http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/?articleID=4031 alt]) by Jack Kapica
 +
 
===Perspectives===
 
===Perspectives===
 
* '''2007-01-31''' [http://www.harpers.org/TheEcstasyOfInfluence.html The Ecstasy of Influence] by Jonathan Lethem: a discoursive investigation into the long-standing cultural practice of copying artistic ideas
 
* '''2007-01-31''' [http://www.harpers.org/TheEcstasyOfInfluence.html The Ecstasy of Influence] by Jonathan Lethem: a discoursive investigation into the long-standing cultural practice of copying artistic ideas

Revision as of 22:11, 7 June 2007

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Overview

As works of a largely informational nature (art, music, writing, computer programs) become an increasingly significant part of our daily lives and increasingly easier to copy, the traditional rights of the creator to control (and profit from) copying are undergoing intensive re-examination.

Counter-movements have arisen to produce freely-copyable works in all of these categories, the best-known of which is the open source movement.

Technically, pure ideas are not supposed to be copyrightable or patentable; what is protected is the expression of the idea, not the idea itself. In practice, however, patents are being granted for such in large numbers, e.g. the Amazon "one-click checkout" patent.

Related Pages

  • Copy Protection is often used to prevent illegal copying of intellectual property.
  • Patents are a particular form of intellectual property.
  • Illegal copying of intellectual property is often hyperbolically called piracy.

Links

Reference

Projects

  • Free Culture UK: for the promotion of free (freely copyable) works of art and culture
  • The Pirate Party: supporting copyright reform (there are sister sites for several other countries)
  • Eric's Commentary on the Shutdown of MathWorld: how an author was sued for copyright infringement of his own work by CRC Press (formerly the Chemical Rubber Company). This is a good illustration of how corporate ownership of copyrights seems to compel agents of said corporations to behave like utter jerks.

News

Perspectives

Satire

Writings

Notes

Not sure where things like Creative Commons fall in the "movement" scheme; are they aligned with open source in any way? Should I be saying "counter-movements" (plural) or "a counter movenent" (singular)? Is there a more general "openness" movement which embraces things like open business? Is "open source" related to transparency, and if so how? --Woozle 15:08, 2 July 2006 (EDT)