Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:About"

Latest revision as of 00:05, 22 July 2020

About

Issuepedia is on a deep-dive mission into the facts behind public discourse, and the deceptions that power players use to engineer public sentiment counter to those facts.

We believe that claims of "objectivity" are often a way of dodging responsibility for confronting the powerful. We will take sides, but only because the evidence supports the side we take – and we won't unilaterally endorse any side's positions just because overall we like that side better. In that sense, we will try to be objective about the evidence, and (more importantly) to follow best practices for epistemic inquiry. If any hand that feeds us ever abuses others, we fully intend to bite it.

Mission: what we're trying to do
Role: how Issuepedia is different from all those other wikis, and how it fits in

Projects

Projects that originated or currently operate within Issuepedia:

Administration

As of this writing, Issuepedia is solely administered and mostly written by Woozle, who invites others to participate. To help support Issuepedia, see Issuepedia:site support.

And yes, I need to do some banners and buttons; nobody's been asking for them, though, so it hasn't been a priority.

The section named "User Roles" has been archived in case it becomes useful later.

The Issuepedia bug tracker is here.

Related Pages

Some of these pages need to be updated or reconsidered with regard to how they fit in, or at least tagged for update:

Issuepedia:Commons: general discussion about the site
Issuepedia:Frequently Arising Questions: ask questions, find answers
Issuepedia:Governmental Brainstorming: fix the government
Issuepedia:Prediction Registry
Issuepedia:Wanted Pages
pages in need of updating (use {{notice/need/update}} to tag pages)

History

2004-11-09 LiveJournal post where I originally laid out the idea which became Issuepedia

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Mission==
+==About==
-Issuepedia is the encyclopedia of issues, analysis, thought, and opinion. As with [[wikipedia:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]], anyone can edit; unlike Wikipedia, we encourage opinions and rants as well as carefully considered analysis and purely factual writing.
+[[Issuepedia:About|Issuepedia]] is on a deep-dive mission into the facts behind public discourse, and the [[rhetorical deception|deceptions]] that [[political power|power]] players use to engineer public sentiment counter to those facts.
-Issuepedia's mission is to aid in the process of making decisions, starting with larger issues (which do not need to be compartmentalized) and gradually developing techniques for working out more immediate disputes.
+We believe that claims of "[[objectivity]]" are often a way of dodging responsibility for confronting the powerful. We will take sides, but only because the evidence supports the side we take &ndash; and we won't unilaterally endorse any side's positions just because overall we like that side better. In that sense, we will try to be objective about the evidence, and (more importantly) to follow [[Issuepedia:Arguing/guidelines|best practices for epistemic inquiry]]. If any hand that feeds us ever abuses others, we fully intend to bite it.
-Issuepedia's immediate functions are:
+* [[Issuepedia:Mission|Mission]]: what we're trying to do
-* to document (and to be a central library for):
+* [[Issuepedia:Role|Role]]: how Issuepedia is different from all those other wikis, and how it fits in
-** significant [[issue]]s
+===Projects===
-** [[opinion]]s held on those issues, along with any available reasoning or background necessary to understand those opinions
+Projects that originated or currently operate within Issuepedia:
-** [[Issuepedia:Analytical toolkit|analytical tools]] available for attempting to reach a reasonable decision on such issues
+* [[InstaGov]]
-* to provide a forum for further discussion
+* [[Issuepedia:Structured Debate]]
-* to provide a central collection point for information about other decision-making tools
+* [[Issuepedia:Link Filing]]
-* [[Issuepedia:Reclaiming words|Reclaiming words]] which have been misappropriated
+==Administration==
-===Issue Encyclopedia===
+As of this writing, Issuepedia is solely administered and mostly written by [[User:Woozle|Woozle]], who invites others to participate. To help support Issuepedia, see [[Issuepedia:site support]].
-Being a [[wikipedia:wiki|wiki]], Issuepedia allows anyone to edit or create any article; Issuepedia's goal is to guide this process towards a comprehensive encyclopedia of issues and opinions, in much the same way that [[wikipedia:Main Page|Wikipedia]] (which uses [[wikipedia:MediaWiki|the same wiki software]]) has become a valuable comprehensive reference work for [[wikipedia:Fact|factual]] information purely through volunteer efforts.
-In traditional formats (such as face-to-face discussion or written editorializing), any argument has always faced a compromise between ''thoroughly informing'' and ''sticking to the point''. There is also a similar conflict between the goals of ''discovering the truth'' and ''making a convincing argument''.
+And yes, I need to do some banners and buttons; nobody's been asking for them, though, so it hasn't been a priority.
-By providing a location where points of argument (and agreement) on any given issue can be documented and referenced, Issuepedia hopes to eliminate much of the endless circular arguing and side-tracking which has always plagued such discussions. The relatively new (c.1990) technique of embedding [[wikipedia:Hyperlink|hyperlinks]] within a discussion or argument makes it easier to provide complete source materials and thorough explanations without getting into a side-track and possibly losing the thread of the main thought.
+''The section named "User Roles" has been [[/archive|archived]] in case it becomes useful later.''
-(See [[Issuepedia:Dispute Resolution Technology|Dispute Resolution Technology]] for further discussion.)
+The Issuepedia bug tracker is [http://rm.vbz.net/projects/issuepedia here].
-===Documentation of Opinion===
+==Related Pages==
-Although Issuepedia ultimately aims to back up all opinions with reasoning, the fact that someone ''holds'' an opinion may be sufficient grounds for including that opinion, especially if the opinion is widely held or is held by a group who makes efforts to have their opinions known. Documenting such opinions makes it possible to begin the process of determining who agrees with that opinion, what arguments exist to support or weaken it, and ultimately whether or not it should be taken seriously.
+Some of these pages need to be updated or reconsidered with regard to how they fit in, or at least tagged for update:
+* [[Issuepedia:Commons]]: general discussion about the site
-Issuepedia also has a policy of allowing [[Issuepedia:reasonably sound opinion|reasonably sound opinion]] to stand without qualification, based on the idea that the truth will gradually emerge by a successive-approximation process called [[Issuepedia:Reinforcement by Contradiction|Reinforcement by Contradiction]].
+* [[Issuepedia:Frequently Arising Questions]]: ask questions, find answers
+* [[Issuepedia:Governmental Brainstorming]]: fix the government
-==Site Role==
+* [[Issuepedia:Prediction Registry]]
-Or, ''how Issuepedia fits in with other similar projects''
+* [[Issuepedia:Wanted Pages]]
+* '''[[:Category:Need.update|pages in need of updating]]''' (use <nowiki>{{notice/need/update}}</nowiki> to tag pages)
-* '''Issuepedia''' draws upon the more complete and (more or less) unbiased information in [[Wikipedia:Main Page|Wikipedia]], and possibly anecdotal and practical information in [[htyp:HTYP:About|HTYP]]. Issupedia's job is to extract the "bones" of the issue from the surrounding "matrix" of related facts, opinions, and arguments in Wikipedia and elsewhere.
+==History==
-* '''Wikipedia''', while generally not regarded as ''authoritative'', can be thought of as reasonably thorough and even definitive; if anyone disagrees with its statements on any given subject, there will almost certainly be discussion to that effect on the "talk" page. No significant stone will be left unturned, and many insignificant ones will be checked as well. Wikipedia may not have all the facts, or even have them all correct (though it generally does a pretty good job), but it can at least be a guide to what pieces of information there are which might need verifying and where one might find more definitive information. Its only flaw, for our purposes, is ''excess'': there is much information which, though clearly on-topic, is not relevant to any ''issues'' under discussion.
+* '''2004-11-09''' [https://woozle.livejournal.com/2004/11/09/ LiveJournal post] where I originally laid out the idea which became Issuepedia
-* '''[http://campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/Campaigns_Wikia Campaigns Wikia]''' is geared towards information about particular political candidates. As such, it will have a lot of useful information upon which Issuepedia can draw. It differs from Issuepedia, however, in that the latter is geared towards general discussion of issues; discussion of current candidates is a part of this, but not the whole picture.
-* '''[[Issuepedia:Wikicitizens|Wikicitizens]]''' (currently in discussion/planning phase) will allow groups of people to coagulate around points of view on which they can agree, and then eventually to engage in inter-group negotiations to create voter blocs on particular issues (etc.)
-==User Roles==
-Users of Issuepedia (including both readers and contributors) have various different roles to play. Users are not restricted to choosing a single role, but it may be helpful to keep in mind which role you are playing at any given time:
-* A '''reader''' reads articles in Issuepedia in order to find what information may be available on a given issue or other topic, but does not contribute content or editing
-* An '''editor''' examines existing contributions and makes improvements to accuracy or clarity, where needed
-* A '''researcher''' compiles facts and opinions from other sources and reports them with (more or less) [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]
-* A '''pundit'''* is someone who states an opinion. Although the opinion should be clearly labeled as such