Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:Filing Room/to file/2021"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 270: Line 270:
 
* https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2021/02/03/do-the-covidiots-even-understand-actuarial-statistics/ - COVID deaths in [[US/MN]]
 
* https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2021/02/03/do-the-covidiots-even-understand-actuarial-statistics/ - COVID deaths in [[US/MN]]
 
** https://octodon.social/@pzmyers/105668242771298868
 
** https://octodon.social/@pzmyers/105668242771298868
 +
* https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/03/realestate/luxury-high-rise-432-park.html
 +
** [https://toot.cat/web/statuses/105668733700861229 private commentary]

Revision as of 18:58, 3 February 2021

January

1/1 (Fri)

1/2 (Sat)

1/3 (Sun)

1/4 (Mon)

1/5 (Tue)

1/6 (Wed)

1/7 (Thu)

1/8 (Fri)

1/9 (Sat)

1/10 (Sun)

1/11 (Mon)

1/12 (Tue)

1/13 (Wed)

to post somewhere

(From Discord on 2021-01-10:

So now I've thought of two ways right-wingism gets its hooks into people:

  • appeals to comforting beliefs: yes, you are in control of your life, you deserve everything you have, anyone who worked as hard as you would have achieved the same thing -- therefore anyone who isn't doing well is pretty much to blame for that (the Cult of Personal Responsibility)
  • appeals to vanity: by always questioning any conclusion which is either widely accepted or seemingly inescapable, you are proving that you are cleverer and more open-minded than the Sheeple -- and you can prove your worthiness and non-sheeplyness by repeating ideas which articulately take down such widely-accepted and/or inescapable conclusions, regardless of whether those arguments make sense on closer examination, in the name of being sure to question everything and examine all sides (Cheap Talk Skepticism)(edited)

1/14 (Thu)

1/15 (Fri)

1/16 (Sat)

1/17 (Sun)

1/18 (Mon)

1/19 (Tue)

1/20 (Wed)

1/21 (Thu)

1/24 (Sun)

1/25 (Mon)

1/27 (Wed)

1/28 (Fri)

February

2/1 (Mon)

2/2 (Tue)