Difference between revisions of "Misrepresentation"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::rhetorical deception category:rhetorical deceptions </hide> ==About== Misrepresentation is a form of rhetorical decepti...")
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[page type::article]]
 
[[page type::article]]
 
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
 
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
+
[[category:rhetorical deception]]
 
</hide>
 
</hide>
 
==About==
 
==About==
 
[[Misrepresentation]] is a form of [[rhetorical deception]] in which someone describes someone else's position inaccurately.
 
[[Misrepresentation]] is a form of [[rhetorical deception]] in which someone describes someone else's position inaccurately.
  
The intent may be either of:
+
The intent may be accidental, or either of:
 
* to make it easier to argue against (a [[straw man]])
 
* to make it easier to argue against (a [[straw man]])
 
* to [[poison the well]] against them
 
* to [[poison the well]] against them
  
As with any rhetorical deception, it is a sign of [[bad faith]].
+
If the misrepresentation is accidental, then the arguer will not repeat the misrepresentation once corrected, and is not intentionally committing a rhetorical deception. If, however, the arguer continues to misrepresent the same position (without at least a disclaimer that they've previously misunderstood it so they might still be explaining it wrong), this is a sign of [[bad faith]].
 
==Related==
 
==Related==
 
* [[Sex reassignment surgery/misrepresentation]]: SRS is often misrepresented as unnecessary or harmful
 
* [[Sex reassignment surgery/misrepresentation]]: SRS is often misrepresented as unnecessary or harmful

Latest revision as of 13:21, 3 August 2021

About

Misrepresentation is a form of rhetorical deception in which someone describes someone else's position inaccurately.

The intent may be accidental, or either of:

If the misrepresentation is accidental, then the arguer will not repeat the misrepresentation once corrected, and is not intentionally committing a rhetorical deception. If, however, the arguer continues to misrepresent the same position (without at least a disclaimer that they've previously misunderstood it so they might still be explaining it wrong), this is a sign of bad faith.

Related