Difference between revisions of "Abortion/ban/eff"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{nav/abortion}} | {{nav/abortion}} | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | Leaving aside the question of whether [[abortion ban]]s are [[../goal| | + | Leaving aside the question of whether [[abortion ban]]s are effective at [[../goal|their supposed goals]], they nonetheless cause many [[/neg|harmful side-effects]], including to many people who have never sought abortions. |
There are no known [[/pos|positive side-effects]]. | There are no known [[/pos|positive side-effects]]. | ||
| + | {{links/news}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:04, 29 January 2025
|
side-effects of abortion bans evidence and claims
|
| abortion |
|---|
|
bans: |
About
Leaving aside the question of whether abortion bans are effective at their supposed goals, they nonetheless cause many harmful side-effects, including to many people who have never sought abortions.
There are no known positive side-effects.
News
- 2025/01/29 11:00 UTC [L..T] Column: The population exodus from antiabortion states is underway and may be picking up steam Research published this month by economists at Georgia Tech validates long-standing predictions that strict abortion bans in many states would drive a mass exodus to more supportive states. Specifically, the paper shows «that by mid-2023, the 13 states with total bans had suffered a combined net loss of an estimated 36,000 residents per quarter, or more than 144,000 per year.»