Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:About"

Latest revision as of 00:05, 22 July 2020

About

Issuepedia is on a deep-dive mission into the facts behind public discourse, and the deceptions that power players use to engineer public sentiment counter to those facts.

We believe that claims of "objectivity" are often a way of dodging responsibility for confronting the powerful. We will take sides, but only because the evidence supports the side we take – and we won't unilaterally endorse any side's positions just because overall we like that side better. In that sense, we will try to be objective about the evidence, and (more importantly) to follow best practices for epistemic inquiry. If any hand that feeds us ever abuses others, we fully intend to bite it.

Mission: what we're trying to do
Role: how Issuepedia is different from all those other wikis, and how it fits in

Projects

Projects that originated or currently operate within Issuepedia:

Administration

As of this writing, Issuepedia is solely administered and mostly written by Woozle, who invites others to participate. To help support Issuepedia, see Issuepedia:site support.

And yes, I need to do some banners and buttons; nobody's been asking for them, though, so it hasn't been a priority.

The section named "User Roles" has been archived in case it becomes useful later.

The Issuepedia bug tracker is here.

Related Pages

Some of these pages need to be updated or reconsidered with regard to how they fit in, or at least tagged for update:

Issuepedia:Commons: general discussion about the site
Issuepedia:Frequently Arising Questions: ask questions, find answers
Issuepedia:Governmental Brainstorming: fix the government
Issuepedia:Prediction Registry
Issuepedia:Wanted Pages
pages in need of updating (use {{notice/need/update}} to tag pages)

History

2004-11-09 LiveJournal post where I originally laid out the idea which became Issuepedia

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Issuepedia's mission is to aid in the process of making important decisions which affect large numbers of people, either directly or indirectly.
+==About==
+[[Issuepedia:About|Issuepedia]] is on a deep-dive mission into the facts behind public discourse, and the [[rhetorical deception|deceptions]] that [[political power|power]] players use to engineer public sentiment counter to those facts.
-Issuepedia's immediate function is to document:
+We believe that claims of "[[objectivity]]" are often a way of dodging responsibility for confronting the powerful. We will take sides, but only because the evidence supports the side we take &ndash; and we won't unilaterally endorse any side's positions just because overall we like that side better. In that sense, we will try to be objective about the evidence, and (more importantly) to follow [[Issuepedia:Arguing/guidelines|best practices for epistemic inquiry]]. If any hand that feeds us ever abuses others, we fully intend to bite it.
-*significant [[issue]]s
-*[[opinion]]s held on those issues along with any reasoning or background necessary to understand those opinions
-*[[Issuepedia:Analytical toolkit|analytical tools]] available for attempting to reach a reasonable decision on such issues
-''See also: [[Article Types]]''
+* [[Issuepedia:Mission|Mission]]: what we're trying to do
+* [[Issuepedia:Role|Role]]: how Issuepedia is different from all those other wikis, and how it fits in
+===Projects===
+Projects that originated or currently operate within Issuepedia:
+* [[InstaGov]]
+* [[Issuepedia:Structured Debate]]
+* [[Issuepedia:Link Filing]]
+==Administration==
+As of this writing, Issuepedia is solely administered and mostly written by [[User:Woozle|Woozle]], who invites others to participate. To help support Issuepedia, see [[Issuepedia:site support]].
-It is also intended as a forum for further discussion, and to provide a central point for information about other forums where issues may be discussed in a productive way. Being a [[wikipedia:wiki|wiki]], it allows anyone to edit any article or to create their own; it is our hope that this process will result in a comprehensive encyclopedia of issues and opinions, in much the same way that [[wikipedia:Main Page|Wikipedia]] (which uses [[wikipedia:MediaWiki|the same wiki software]]) has become a valuable comprehensive reference work for [[wikipedia:Fact|factual]] information purely through volunteer efforts.
+And yes, I need to do some banners and buttons; nobody's been asking for them, though, so it hasn't been a priority.
-By providing a location where points of argument (and agreement) on any given issue can be documented and referenced, Issuepedia hopes to eliminate much of the endless circular arguing and side-tracking which has always plagued such discussions. In traditional formats (such as face-to-face discussion or written editorializing), any argument has always faced a compromise between ''thoroughly informing'' and ''sticking to the point''. The relatively new technique of embedding [[wikipedia:Hyperlink|hyperlinks]] within a discussion or argument makes it easier to provide complete source materials and thorough explanations without getting into a side-track and possibly losing the thread of the main thought.
+''The section named "User Roles" has been [[/archive|archived]] in case it becomes useful later.''
-==User Roles==
-Users of Issuepedia (including both readers and contributors) have various different roles to play. Users are not restricted to choosing a single role, but it may be helpful to keep in mind which role you are playing at any given time:
-* A '''reader''' reads articles in Issuepedia in order to find what information may be available on a given issue or other topic, but does not contribute content or editing
-* An '''editor''' examines existing contributions and makes improvements to accuracy or clarity, where needed
-* A '''researcher''' compiles facts and opinions from other sources and reports them with (more or less) [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]
-* A '''pundit'''* is someone who states an opinion. Although the opinion should be clearly labeled as such &ndash; Issuepedia recommends the use of a section header entitled "Opinon" or prefixed with the word "Opinionated" ("Opinionated Statement", "Opinionated Summary"), the body of the opinion may be phrased in factual terms ("This action is just plain wrong!"). The point is not so much to convince anyone of the expressed point of view as it is just to "weigh in" that this is what you think.
-* A '''debater'''* is someone who examines the known facts relating to a given issue, and uses that information to argue towards a conclusion. Such writings may also refer to opinions, but mainly as a way of gauging the relevance of an issue or as a launching point for the discussion ("Person X thinks such-and-so; I've looked at the evidence, and here's what I see.") Issuepedia does not yet have a recommended format for writings of this nature, though prefixing the article or section's title with "Thoughts on" should make it clear that the writing contains both opinions and analysis.
-* I'm using these words until I think of something better
+The Issuepedia bug tracker is [http://rm.vbz.net/projects/issuepedia here].
+==Related Pages==
-There may be other relevant roles I haven't thought of yet.
+Some of these pages need to be updated or reconsidered with regard to how they fit in, or at least tagged for update:
+* [[Issuepedia:Commons]]: general discussion about the site
+* [[Issuepedia:Frequently Arising Questions]]: ask questions, find answers
+* [[Issuepedia:Governmental Brainstorming]]: fix the government
+* [[Issuepedia:Prediction Registry]]
+* [[Issuepedia:Wanted Pages]]
+* '''[[:Category:Need.update|pages in need of updating]]''' (use <nowiki>{{notice/need/update}}</nowiki> to tag pages)
+==History==
+* '''2004-11-09''' [https://woozle.livejournal.com/2004/11/09/ LiveJournal post] where I originally laid out the idea which became Issuepedia