Difference between revisions of "Conflation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 82.176.110.171 (Talk) to last version by Woozle) |
(this is short, but it doesn't really need to be a seed) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <hide> | |
| − | [[Category:logical fallacies]][[Conflation]] is "the error of treating two distinct concepts as if they were one." {{wpref|conflation}} | + | [[page type::article]] |
| − | + | [[thing type::logical fallacy]] [[thing type::concept]] | |
| − | + | [[Category:logical fallacies]] | |
| + | [[category:concepts]] | ||
| + | </hide> | ||
| + | ==About== | ||
| + | [[Conflation]] is "the error of treating two distinct concepts as if they were one." {{wpref|conflation}} It is a form of [[rhetorical manipulation]]. | ||
==Related Articles== | ==Related Articles== | ||
* [[Equivocation]] is a type of conflation | * [[Equivocation]] is a type of conflation | ||
| + | ==Links== | ||
| + | ===Reference=== | ||
| + | * {{Wikipedia}} | ||
| + | * {{conservapedia}}: see [[conservapedia:Logical fallacy#Conflation]] | ||
| + | * {{rationalwiki}} | ||
| + | ===News=== | ||
| + | {{links/news}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:55, 26 April 2015
About
Conflation is "the error of treating two distinct concepts as if they were one." [W] It is a form of rhetorical manipulation.
Related Articles
- Equivocation is a type of conflation
