Difference between revisions of "Electoral fraud/US"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: filed links section)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Issues]]There have been repeated claims in the past two United States Presidential elections (2004 and 2000) of vote-rigging via defective voting machines, mass deletions of registered voters, and other means.  
+
<hide>
 +
[[where::US]]
 +
[[category:issue]]
 +
</hide>
 +
{{need/update}}
 +
==About==
 +
There has been repeated evidence of [[election fraud]] in recent US presidential elections.
  
In the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2000|2000 election]], [[George W. Bush]] was officially elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%), and in the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2004|2004 presidential election]] he was officially re-elected by somewhat less narrow margin (286/538, 53.2%). According to many claims, he would have been the clear loser in both cases had the votes been counted correctly.
+
In the [[2000 US presidential election]], [[George W. Bush]] was officially elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%). According to many claims, he would have been the clear loser had the votes been counted correctly.
==Links==
 
===2008 Elections===
 
''see also: [[2008 US elections]]'', [[2008 US presidential race]]
 
===2006 Elections===
 
''see also: [[2006 US elections]]''
 
  
No reports of fraud so far.
+
There were also widespread allegations of fraud in the [[2004 US elections]], though it is less clear what the results should have been.
===2004 Elections===
+
==Related Pages==
''see also: [[2004 US elections]]''
+
===Elections===
* '''2006-06-01''' [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen Was the 2004 Election Stolen?] by [[Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.]]
+
* '''2008''': [[US/president/elec/2008|2008 US presidential election]]
** '''2006-06-07''' [http://www.alternet.org/rights/37153/ RFK Jr: Taking the Stolen Election Seriously]: further analysis by Thom Hartmann (AlterNet)
+
* '''2006''': [[US/elec/2006|2006 US elections]]: No known reports of fraud
* '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/19421.html votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date] ([http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/1326217 2006-02-24 slashdot])
+
* '''2004''': [[US/president/elec/2004|2004 US presidential election]]: Widespread fraud alleged, upshot unclear
* '''2006-02-22''' [http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/socal/la-me-diebold22feb22,0,33600.story?coll=la-news-politics-local Man Pleads Not Guilty in Voting Device Case][([http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot?m=3948 2006-02-26 slashdot])
+
* '''2000''': [[US/president/elec/2000|2000 US presidential election]]
===2000 Election===
+
{{links/smw}}
* "Although it was reported &ndash; in ''The New York Times'', no less &ndash; that [[Al Gore]] got more votes than [[George W. Bush]] in a statewide recount of Florida 'no matter what standard was chosen to judge voter intent,' most Americans don't know to this day that '''Gore actually won the 2000 election'''. The reason is a small percentage of [[US Republican Party|Republican]] spin and a large percentage of journalistic cowardice in the mainstream media following [[9/11]]. (This cowardice is limited to the USA, by the way &ndash; the story was extensively covered in most of the rest of the world.)" [http://www.alternet.org/rights/37153/] Interestingly, the [http://web.archive.org/web/20020226121308/http://www10.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/politics/12VOTE.html original article] leaves the reader with the opposite impression; the AlterNet article points this out and concludes that the ''Times'' did not want to undermine [[George W. Bush|Bush]]'s authority in a time of crisis (the article having been published not long after [[9/11]]).
 
* [http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp The Fall of the Athenian Republic] at Snopes debunks some inaccurate Internet-rumors about the 2000 election
 
===Filed Links===
 
{{links.tagged}}
 

Latest revision as of 16:01, 9 February 2022

This page is in need of updating.

About

There has been repeated evidence of election fraud in recent US presidential elections.

In the 2000 US presidential election, George W. Bush was officially elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%). According to many claims, he would have been the clear loser had the votes been counted correctly.

There were also widespread allegations of fraud in the 2004 US elections, though it is less clear what the results should have been.

Related Pages

Elections