Difference between revisions of "Argument-in-a-box"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Woozle moved page Argument in a box to Argument-in-a-box: seems more natural when used in a sentence) |
m (post-move update) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | An [[argument in a box]] is a short phrase which implies a [[logical argument]] – or, more precisely, asserts a conclusion and hints at the argument behind it – without actually stating it explicitly. It is a form of [[rhetorical deception]]. | + | An [[argument-in-a-box]] is a short phrase which implies a [[logical argument]] – or, more precisely, asserts a conclusion and hints at the argument behind it – without actually stating it explicitly. It is a form of [[rhetorical deception]]. |
==Related== | ==Related== | ||
* [[Special:SearchByProperty/Thing-20type/argument in a box|list]] | * [[Special:SearchByProperty/Thing-20type/argument in a box|list]] | ||
{{seed}} | {{seed}} | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 9 January 2013
About
An argument-in-a-box is a short phrase which implies a logical argument – or, more precisely, asserts a conclusion and hints at the argument behind it – without actually stating it explicitly. It is a form of rhetorical deception.
Related
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|