Difference between revisions of "Death penalty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Points: attrib for Midian comment; changed Points to Comments; added comment about miscarriage of justice) |
(→Comments: "conspiracy" objection) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* {{faint|[[User:Midian|Midian]] says}}: The Death Penalty is about vengeance, revenge, an eye for an eye. While I agree there are some who have no value for human life and cannot be rehabilitated, killing is wrong, no matter who is doing it, including the government. | * {{faint|[[User:Midian|Midian]] says}}: The Death Penalty is about vengeance, revenge, an eye for an eye. While I agree there are some who have no value for human life and cannot be rehabilitated, killing is wrong, no matter who is doing it, including the government. | ||
* One major problem with the death penalty is that it makes no allowance for miscarriages of justice to be rectified later (i.e. someone is executed and then later found to be innocent) and this ''does'' happen on a fairly regular basis, from what I understand. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:25, 28 July 2006 (EDT) | * One major problem with the death penalty is that it makes no allowance for miscarriages of justice to be rectified later (i.e. someone is executed and then later found to be innocent) and this ''does'' happen on a fairly regular basis, from what I understand. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:25, 28 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | * A related objection is that the death penalty can be used to prevent a framed witness from talking, in the case of a henchman fanatically loyal to a high-level conspiracy; even in the absence of a ''real'' conspiracy, an executed perpetrator can give rise to conspiracy ''theories'' by this same reasoning, thus clouding the issue and hindering true investigation. Human beings, even hardened criminals, even monsters like [[Saddam Hussein]], are too valuable to simply kill. They must be absolutely prevented from causing further harm, reformed if possible, but ''kept alive'' either way, however little they may deserve it. | ||
Revision as of 05:12, 28 January 2007
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
The death penalty refers to the legal killing of a person as punishment for crime. It is widely considered to be inhumane, and is illegal in many parts of the world but not in the United States.
Reference
Opinions
- 2005-12-13 Michael Goettsche (tuxipuxi): Time for a change: a rant
Comments
- How can anyone who claims to be "pro-life" support the death penalty? Many apparently do.
- Midian says: The Death Penalty is about vengeance, revenge, an eye for an eye. While I agree there are some who have no value for human life and cannot be rehabilitated, killing is wrong, no matter who is doing it, including the government.
- One major problem with the death penalty is that it makes no allowance for miscarriages of justice to be rectified later (i.e. someone is executed and then later found to be innocent) and this does happen on a fairly regular basis, from what I understand. --Woozle 19:25, 28 July 2006 (EDT)
- A related objection is that the death penalty can be used to prevent a framed witness from talking, in the case of a henchman fanatically loyal to a high-level conspiracy; even in the absence of a real conspiracy, an executed perpetrator can give rise to conspiracy theories by this same reasoning, thus clouding the issue and hindering true investigation. Human beings, even hardened criminals, even monsters like Saddam Hussein, are too valuable to simply kill. They must be absolutely prevented from causing further harm, reformed if possible, but kept alive either way, however little they may deserve it.