Difference between revisions of "Religion in politics"
(→Links: campaign season on planet Glox) |
(polished overview; added filed links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:US.issues]]{{seed}} |
| − | == | + | ==Overview== |
| − | Religious fundamentalists or evangelists who attain office and who openly make political decisions based on their faith are a problem. This is partly because they tend to make those decisions based upon | + | This is mainly a problem in the {{USA}}. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Religious]] fundamentalists or evangelists who attain office and who openly make political decisions based on their faith are a problem. This is partly because they tend to make those decisions based upon values which are often both ethically questionable ''and'' unavailable for questioning (due to their supposed basis in [[faith]] rather than [[reason]]). More generally, they also tend to be [[extremist]]s in advocating the viewpoint of their particular religion, rather than supporting [[religious freedom]] (one of the [[US founding principles|founding principles of the United States]]) much less the right to [[freedom from religion]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For similar reasons, religious groups actively supporting a particular candidate are a problem. This violates the US's [[separation of church and state]] and the terms of religious tax-exemption, and tends to be indicative of a [[powermongery|power-oriented agenda]] rather than one which is truly in the best interests of its members. | ||
==Related Pages== | ==Related Pages== | ||
* [[separation of church and state]] | * [[separation of church and state]] | ||
* [[Ten Commandments]] | * [[Ten Commandments]] | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| − | * [http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9178374/gods_senator God's senator]: Sam Brownback | + | ===Filed Links=== |
| + | {{links.tagged}} | ||
| + | ===Articles=== | ||
| + | * [http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9178374/gods_senator God's senator]: [[Sam Brownback]] | ||
* [http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/articles/051128roco02 American "Rapture"] | * [http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/articles/051128roco02 American "Rapture"] | ||
===humor=== | ===humor=== | ||
* '''2007-05-29''' (comic) [http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=22368 This Modern World: Campaign season on planet Glox!] | * '''2007-05-29''' (comic) [http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=22368 This Modern World: Campaign season on planet Glox!] | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 24 January 2008
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Overview
This is mainly a problem in the United States.
Religious fundamentalists or evangelists who attain office and who openly make political decisions based on their faith are a problem. This is partly because they tend to make those decisions based upon values which are often both ethically questionable and unavailable for questioning (due to their supposed basis in faith rather than reason). More generally, they also tend to be extremists in advocating the viewpoint of their particular religion, rather than supporting religious freedom (one of the founding principles of the United States) much less the right to freedom from religion.
For similar reasons, religious groups actively supporting a particular candidate are a problem. This violates the US's separation of church and state and the terms of religious tax-exemption, and tends to be indicative of a power-oriented agenda rather than one which is truly in the best interests of its members.
Related Pages
Links
Filed Links
- redirect template:links/smw
Articles
humor
- 2007-05-29 (comic) This Modern World: Campaign season on planet Glox!