Difference between revisions of "Asymmetric warfare"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==Overview== category:conceptsAsymmetric warfare "originally referred to war between two or more actors or groups whose relative power differs significantly. Contemporary military ...) |
m (→Applicability: superfluous comma) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[category:concepts]][[Asymmetric warfare]] "originally referred to war between two or more actors or groups whose relative power differs significantly. Contemporary military thinkers tend to broaden this to include asymmetry of strategy or tactics" {{wpref|Asymmetric warfare}}.{{seed}} | [[category:concepts]][[Asymmetric warfare]] "originally referred to war between two or more actors or groups whose relative power differs significantly. Contemporary military thinkers tend to broaden this to include asymmetry of strategy or tactics" {{wpref|Asymmetric warfare}}.{{seed}} | ||
==Applicability== | ==Applicability== | ||
| − | Both the [[war on terror]] and the [[war on drugs]] are forms of asymmetric warfare | + | Both the [[war on terror]] and the [[war on drugs]] are forms of asymmetric warfare in that the enemy is scattered among populations with whom we are not at war, thus preventing the use of large-scale weaponry most of the time, and generally precluding the use of tactics which would be effective against a geopolitical enemy. |
Latest revision as of 15:52, 13 September 2007
Overview
Asymmetric warfare "originally referred to war between two or more actors or groups whose relative power differs significantly. Contemporary military thinkers tend to broaden this to include asymmetry of strategy or tactics" [W].
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Applicability
Both the war on terror and the war on drugs are forms of asymmetric warfare in that the enemy is scattered among populations with whom we are not at war, thus preventing the use of large-scale weaponry most of the time, and generally precluding the use of tactics which would be effective against a geopolitical enemy.