Difference between revisions of "Electoral fraud/US"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→2004 Election: voting device case 2/22) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==2004 Election== | ==2004 Election== | ||
* '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/19421.html votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date] ([http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/1326217 2006-02-24 slashdot]) | * '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/19421.html votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date] ([http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/1326217 2006-02-24 slashdot]) | ||
| + | * '''2006-02-22''' [http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/socal/la-me-diebold22feb22,0,33600.story?coll=la-news-politics-local Man Pleads Not Guilty in Voting Device Case][([http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot?m=3948 2006-02-26 slashdot]) | ||
Revision as of 00:27, 28 February 2006
There have been repeated claims of election-rigging via defective voting machines in recent US elections, most notably the 2000 presidential election in which George W. Bush was elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%) and the 2004 presidential election in which he was re-elected by somewhat less narrow margin (286/538, 53.2%).