Difference between revisions of "Technology"
(Added an argument for the instrumentalist view.) |
(Added an argument in favor of technological determinism.) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Technological determinism== | ==Technological determinism== | ||
− | The technological determinist position states that technological progress is an automonous force outside human control and has been the primary factor shaping the course of history. According to Karl Marx,"The windmill gives you a society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist." Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote,"Things are in the saddle / And ride mankind." In a sense, humans become "the sex organs of the machine world", as Marshall McLuhan put it. The role of humans is to create increasingly complex technology until the technology reaches the point when it can reproduce on its own. Technology has its own ends, independent of humanity. | + | The technological determinist position states that technological progress is an automonous force outside human control and has been the primary factor shaping the course of history. According to Karl Marx,"The windmill gives you a society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist." Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote,"Things are in the saddle / And ride mankind." In a sense, humans become "the sex organs of the machine world", as Marshall McLuhan put it. Technology undergoes a form of natural selection in the marketplace. People choose to purchase certain technology over others. This leads to a sort of evolutionary change in technology. The role of humans is to create increasingly complex technology until the technology reaches the point when it can reproduce on its own. Technology has its own ends, independent of humanity. |
+ | |||
+ | In the larger view of human civilization, it seems improbable that humanity had much control over the direction and speed of technological progress. The origin of a new technology has often had profound effects on the course of human civilization and societies have been forced to adopt a technology to continue existing or face extinction. For example, the European colonists in the Americas brought new technologies such as firearms and cannons with them. This new technology helped tip the balance of power in favor of the Europeans over the natives and lead to rapid conquest of native land during the colonial period. To be able to use this technology, European society had to adopt economic and social changes that allowed gunpowder-based warfare. Although people are able to control technology to some degree, people often must adapt to technology to successfully use it. In this way, technology can control humans to some degree. | ||
==Technological instrumentalism== | ==Technological instrumentalism== |
Revision as of 07:58, 5 July 2011
Technology has played an important role in human civilization. From earliest times up to the present, various forms of technology have been an important part of human culture. However, there is disagreement on the role of technology in human civilization. Historians, philosophers and other thinkers have debated this question for centuries and there are two major positions on this issue: the determinist position and the instrumentalist position.
Technological determinism
The technological determinist position states that technological progress is an automonous force outside human control and has been the primary factor shaping the course of history. According to Karl Marx,"The windmill gives you a society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist." Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote,"Things are in the saddle / And ride mankind." In a sense, humans become "the sex organs of the machine world", as Marshall McLuhan put it. Technology undergoes a form of natural selection in the marketplace. People choose to purchase certain technology over others. This leads to a sort of evolutionary change in technology. The role of humans is to create increasingly complex technology until the technology reaches the point when it can reproduce on its own. Technology has its own ends, independent of humanity.
In the larger view of human civilization, it seems improbable that humanity had much control over the direction and speed of technological progress. The origin of a new technology has often had profound effects on the course of human civilization and societies have been forced to adopt a technology to continue existing or face extinction. For example, the European colonists in the Americas brought new technologies such as firearms and cannons with them. This new technology helped tip the balance of power in favor of the Europeans over the natives and lead to rapid conquest of native land during the colonial period. To be able to use this technology, European society had to adopt economic and social changes that allowed gunpowder-based warfare. Although people are able to control technology to some degree, people often must adapt to technology to successfully use it. In this way, technology can control humans to some degree.
Technological instrumentalism
The technological instrumentalist position states that technology has no ends of its own and exists only to accomplish human ends. Technology in completely under the control of humanity and human history is shaped by humans, not technology.
People make decisions about what technology they will use and how they will use it. Societies collectively do the same thing. For example, the Japanese banned the use of firearms for hundreds of years in order to preserve their traditional culture. The Amish choose not to use modern technology for religious reasons, even though they are surrounded by modern American communities. Nations put legal restrictions on the use of certain technologies such as weapons. These examples suggest that technology is completely under human control.